Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: WorkingClassFilth
...but the individual - for whatever reason - is effectively removed from the gene pool by genetic design.

Not entirely. Say a couple...a quaint old concept...has four offspring. One homosexual offspring and one that dies in infancy do not reproduce. The two remaining offspring do. All four offspring were variations of two people's DNA. The survivors have a great deal of DNA in common with the non-reproducers, and pass it along.

Each of us is composed, genetically, of an eighth of each of our great-grandparents DNA, a quarter of each of our grandparents. A first cousin shares one eighth of our DNA.

42 posted on 07/24/2015 8:59:21 PM PDT by gundog (Help us, Nairobi-Wan Kenobi...you're our only hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: gundog

All true, but to not reproduce by sexual means is to be condemned by mathematical outcomes as defective programming. The fit reproduce and dominate the pool.


44 posted on 07/24/2015 9:29:38 PM PDT by WorkingClassFilth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson