Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Polygamous Montana Trio Applies for Wedding License
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory/polygamous-montana-trio-applies-wedding-license-32162748 ^ | Jul 1, 2015 | MATT VOLZ Associated Press

Posted on 07/02/2015 6:13:07 PM PDT by StormPrepper

Nathan Collier and his wives Victoria and Christine applied at the Yellowstone County Courthouse in Billings on Tuesday in an attempt to legitimize their polygamous marriage. Montana, like all 50 states, outlaws bigamy — holding multiple marriage licenses — but Collier said he plans to sue if the application is denied.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: 3rdtime; 4thtime; homosexualagenda; lawsuit; libertarians; medicalmarijuana; montana; obamanation; polygamy; searchworks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: FreeReign
-- Yet, they're silent. --

I've seen at least one serious article by a pro-homo type that is stridenly against group love. Group love deprives males of desireable females (as if lesbo marriage doesn't!), and a couple other arguments that are easy to blast through.

The homo-marriage advocates want to be special, and now that they have what they sought, they aren't special any more.

21 posted on 07/02/2015 6:59:16 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: StormPrepper

I don’t support polygamy, but if I had to choose I would pick it over same sex “marriage”.


22 posted on 07/02/2015 7:01:37 PM PDT by Clump (Bestowing dignity on sodomy is like bestowing fragrance on a turd.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RetiredTexasVet

The North American Man Dog Love Association is watching this Very Closely!


23 posted on 07/02/2015 7:04:06 PM PDT by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MeshugeMikey
The transpecies people have rights, too. Who are we to decide who they can "love?"
If two men can play married, omg anything can marry. What's the difference?
Chicken + man = "love."
Woman + birch tree branch = "love."

24 posted on 07/02/2015 7:11:31 PM PDT by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
-- John Roberts, in his dissent, said he couldn't see a principled way of opening the door to same-sex couples without also letting polygamists through." --

So what? There is no need for a "principled reason," as the majority proved. Just deny marriage to love groups on a whim, and call it done/law of the land.

25 posted on 07/02/2015 7:13:44 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
-- Woman + birch tree branch = "love." --

That's racist. Birch trees have white bark. What do you have against black walnuts, anyway?

26 posted on 07/02/2015 7:15:09 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
That's racist. Birch trees have white bark. What do you have against black walnuts, anyway?

I've heard once you've had a black walnut tree branch, you never go back. Is it true?

27 posted on 07/02/2015 7:20:32 PM PDT by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: StormPrepper

28 posted on 07/02/2015 7:26:06 PM PDT by GraceG (Protect the Border from Illegal Aliens, Don't Protect Illegal Alien Boarders...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
-- I've heard once you've had a black walnut tree branch, you never go back. Is it true? --

Are you nuts?! Did you see the size of that trunk?

29 posted on 07/02/2015 7:30:07 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: StormPrepper

The government is going to have to end up out of the marriage business.


30 posted on 07/02/2015 7:35:04 PM PDT by headstamp 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headstamp 2
The government is going to have to end up out of the marriage business.

Should have been left to the churches in the first place. Common law took care of what the churches didn't (Because if a man and woman can stay together for 5-7 years, they're not going anywhere).

31 posted on 07/02/2015 7:41:14 PM PDT by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics

All We Need is Love...da..da.da..da..da.

Its the beatles All Over Again

.... then again Jimi Hendrix... [ strange guy for a FR thread but ] once axed....Is this uh LOVE...or Is It Confusion


32 posted on 07/02/2015 8:12:28 PM PDT by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

Comment #33 Removed by Moderator

To: Cboldt

Yes, because it cannot be limited to 3, right? Polyamory neans many loves or more than one love, doesn’t it?


34 posted on 07/02/2015 9:01:23 PM PDT by ozaukeemom (Is there even a republic left?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.

That’s right, the feminists will never allow the oppression of two women by one man! /sarcasm;)


35 posted on 07/02/2015 9:34:41 PM PDT by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
Are you rooting for them, or against them?

Well, that's an interesting question. I'm not sure.

From my point of view the laws against polygamy were created to enforce one religions doctrine on another religion. Religion by force. So pretty much unconstitutional.

However, it really doesn't matter at this point. Just forget about it and know that it's all expected. Worry about preparing for what's coming.

The modern religionists are talking about a new world order and the raise of some anti-christ in some kind of an organized world government. They're very wrong.

And a good percentage of the "Christians" think they are going to be raptured away from the destruction that's about to happen. Again, they are very very wrong.


36 posted on 07/02/2015 9:40:02 PM PDT by StormPrepper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

True; both polygamy and concubines have been around for millennia. Odd to me as a Christian, but more normal than what a gay man does to another man’s poop chute...


37 posted on 07/03/2015 2:55:06 AM PDT by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

I hope they win so we can stop pretending the 2015 definition of marriage is anything but a joke. It will focus an unwelcome scrutiny on the post-Christian Supreme Court majority, and the deviants who pushed for “gay marriage”...


38 posted on 07/03/2015 3:46:15 AM PDT by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: StormPrepper

Didn’t see that one coming.


39 posted on 07/03/2015 4:25:21 AM PDT by markomalley (Nothing emboldens the wicked so greatly as the lack of courage on the part of the good -- Leo XIII)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


40 posted on 07/03/2015 5:45:24 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson