LOL I was waiting for someone naive enough to try that one. She didn’t stop there with that thought. She tied it to earning grace and “sharing in redemption” as if Christ didn’t do quite enough. Catholics just can’t help but try to take some of the credit can they? Like I said vlad, not one point was according to scripture.
“LOL I was waiting for someone naive enough to try that one.”
LOL I was waiting for an anti-Catholic to try and spin that one.
“She didn’t stop there with that thought.”
The anti-Catholic won’t stop there with the spin.
“She tied it to earning grace and “sharing in redemption” as if Christ didn’t do quite enough.”
The anti-Catholic will falsely claim the author said something about “earning grace” and claim “sharing in redemption” means “Christ didn’t do quite enough”.
“Catholics just can’t help but try to take some of the credit can they?”
Anti-Catholics just can’t help but try to fake things to attack Catholics.
“Like I said vlad, not one point was according to scripture.”
Like I said, CynicalBear, many times, Newman was right when he wrote, “To Protestantism False Witness is the principle of propagation.”