Point out your primary sources on Amendment XIV’s debate to amend on the insistence that innate qualities equal unnatural non-sensible behaviors.
Original intent or do you support infallible “relative” readings in Constitutional law not even based on common law/natural law from which the charter sprang from.
Exactly! Methinks the constitution does not mean what the poster thinks it means. Where does it say homosexual acts are protected behavior? Please note that religious freedom is a clearly enumerated right. Sexual preference? Not so much.