[paladinan]

Well... are you saying that you’d actually CONSIDER a reply thoughtfully, rather than just dismiss it with loads of spit, vinegar, and theatrics?

There’s a world of difference between “proving something” and “proving something to YOU [you = anyone who’s receiving the comment]”. The former is ruled by the laws of logic; the latter has the distinct possibility of being unable to get past personal bias of the listener... which is REALLY tiresome, especially after hundreds of attempts on dozens of threads (all with the same predictable results).

[HossB86]

Well... are you saying that you’d actually CONSIDER a reply thoughtfully, rather than just dismiss it with loads of spit, vinegar, and theatrics?

I always consider a reply thoughtfully -- if the reply warrants further consideration, then it gets it. When the reply is the "same old same old" that's been refuted time and again, it's dismissed.

And speaking got spit, vinegar, and theatrics:

Pot, meet Kettle.

Hoss

[Elsie]

 

Well... are you saying that you’d actually CONSIDER a reply thoughtfully, rather than just dismiss it with loads of spit, vinegar, and theatrics?

Where on earth do Protestants GET this stuff? Is Pier 1 having a sale on straw men, or something?

Any chance you could give up anti-Catholic rants, and take up golfing, or something?

 

FRiend: is that really all you can offer? Nonsense, wrapped up in snark, which is wrapped up in straw-men?

 

Well... are you saying that you’d actually CONSIDER a reply thoughtfully, rather than just dismiss it with loads of spit, vinegar, and theatrics?

Where on earth do Protestants GET this stuff? Is Pier 1 having a sale on straw men, or something?