[DeprogramLiberalism]

>>>DEPROGRAMLIBERALISM offers his “own” books on Meta-Christianity to refute Catholic doctrine and poses a series of questions about differences of opinion between James and Peter and Paul. He forgets the very genesis of this confusion. It’s an old Protestant theme used to undermine Petrine authority. This has been answered over and over again. But here’s a basic refutation. http://socrates58.blogspot.com/2006/03/50-new-testament-proofs-for-petrine.html<<<

Yawn - more obfuscation...

By the way, my books were not written to specifically refute RC doctrine - but they do anyway, along with a lot of Protestant doctrines as well.

[Steelfish]

Well of course. So anything reasoning that contradicts your “meta-Christianity” is either wrong or a “yawn” (now that’s a real argument).
Sorry, but I’ll take Augustine, Aquinas, Newman, or Benedict XVI whose writing fill the shelves of university theological libraries any day before I spend a minute on any other sophomoric screed.