Well of course. So anything reasoning that contradicts your “meta-Christianity” is either wrong or a “yawn” (now that’s a real argument).
Sorry, but I’ll take Augustine, Aquinas, Newman, or Benedict XVI whose writing fill the shelves of university theological libraries any day before I spend a minute on any other sophomoric screed.
What "reasoning" - what "contradicts"?!? You have presented no counterarguments at all.
>>>Sorry, but I’ll take Augustine, Aquinas, Newman, or Benedict XVI whose writing fill the shelves of university theological libraries any day before I spend a minute on any other sophomoric screed.<<<
I never expected that you would. Just like I have never expected you to actually put forth substantive counterarguments, because you don't have any. I am simply using you to post things that may be of interest to others. Your arguments have been empty of substance from the beginning and will never contain any. You have a hollow belief system that you have let others fill, devoid of the most important ingredient in determining facts and truth - skepticism. Skepticism means having to know all sides of an argument. When one says black and another says white, the only way to determine which to accept and which to reject is to investigate both black and white. Intransigence is blindly choosing one to the exclusion of the other. You have more faith in mere men than in the Scriptures. So sad...