“Enough contradictory evidence exists that your claim is the equivalent to the settled science of man-made global warming.”
No.
“The link takes a very deep dive into those issues. Im dealing with it.”
The material you’re linking to is written by a man who seriously thinks Paul’s letters are actually the work of Simon of Samaria and then were reworked by a cabal of “proto-orthodox” Christians. I can’t take Roger Parvus’ work seriously - and neither should you.
“The material youre linking to is written by a man who seriously thinks Pauls letters are actually the work of Simon of Samaria and then were reworked by a cabal of proto-orthodox Christians. I cant take Roger Parvus work seriously - and neither should you.”
This is an ad hominem logical fallacy.
His examination of facts and arguments stands alone and any objective judgment must evaluate those facts. The issues he raises are accurate. His solutions should be evaluated on their merits and may or may not be correct.
At least that is what truth seekers do.