Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Swordmaker

If Christ was wearing the cloth around his face and then covered in a shroud, wouldn’t there be a difference in the image of the head and the rest of the body?


19 posted on 05/03/2015 11:48:47 AM PDT by Mean Daddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Mean Daddy
If Christ was wearing the cloth around his face and then covered in a shroud, wouldn’t there be a difference in the image of the head and the rest of the body?

All of the scholarship finds the Jewish burial requirements hold that if there was a shroud used, the face was not covered by a separate cloth. However the cloth here was used as a kerchief like rope to tie the jaw closed, and was wrapped AROUND the face. . . under the jaw, passing under the beard, behind the ears and hair, and then being tied above the crown of the head. i.e. around and about the the face to keep the mouth closed in death, otherwise the mouth would gape open. Similarly a coin or potsherd would be placed to weight the eyelids closed (such coins or potsherds are often found in the eyesocktets of skulls). Also the wrists and ankles would be bound with a similar cloth strip of binding to keep them from flopping akimbo when rigor mortis passed. These practices are documented in Jewish writings of the period.

If no shroud were available small cloths and modesty cloths would be used, but cloth was expensive, representing several days to weeks of work by skilled craftsmen and women to produce.

28 posted on 05/03/2015 2:49:34 PM PDT by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users contnue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson