Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Campion; metmom; boatbums; caww; presently no screen name; redleghunter; Springfield Reformer; ...
But since nobody is infallible, how do you know that's really true?

Lets get to that, but first let is be established that inspiration is not to be confused with the novel and unScriptural premise of ensured perpetual magisterial infallibility as per Rome (unless you believe infallible decrees are inspired as Scripture is).

But since nobody is infallible, how do you know that's really true? How do you know the Apostle John really "explicitly wrote" it, anyway? How do you know there was an "Apostle John"? How do you "know" what "to know" means?

Thus your premise is that ensured perpetual magisterial infallibility is essential for the discernment of what is of God, correct?

But which premise invalidates the NT church, as it began with souls having rightly discerned both men and writings as being of God, and following an itinerant Preacher whom the historical magisterium/stewards of Scripture rejected, and whom the Messiah reproved them Scripture as being supreme, (Mk. 7:2-16) and established His Truth claims upon scriptural substantiation in word and in power, as did the early church as it began upon this basis. (Mt. 22:23-45; Lk. 24:27,44; Jn. 5:36,39; Acts 2:14-35; 4:33; 5:12; 15:6-21;17:2,11; 18:28; 28:23; Rm. 15:19; 2Cor. 12:12, etc.)

Thus under the Roman model your operate out of then you have nuked the church.

614 posted on 04/30/2015 8:49:41 AM PDT by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: daniel1212; Campion; metmom; boatbums; caww; presently no screen name; redleghunter; ...

**Thus your premise is that ensured perpetual magisterial infallibility is essential for the discernment of what is of God, correct?**

And yet, right here on FR, we see Roman Catholics interpreting the Magisterium in multiple ways.

Which one of them is right or wrong? How are we to know?


619 posted on 04/30/2015 8:56:38 AM PDT by Gamecock (Why do bad things happen to good people? That only happened once, and He volunteered. R.C. Sproul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 614 | View Replies ]

To: daniel1212
But which premise invalidates the NT church, as it began with souls having rightly discerned both men and writings as being of God, and following an itinerant Preacher whom the historical magisterium/stewards of Scripture rejected,

"Historical magisterium/stewards of Scripture"...?!?

What sort of contrived, shoe-horned-only-for-the-sake-of-smearing-the-word-'Magisterium' clap-trap is THAT?

Good grief, FRiend... are you seriously saying that, since the Sanhedrin was an organized authority, and the Catholic Church is an organized hierarchy, and the Sanhedrin were wrong, therefore the Catholic Church must be wrong? Wow...

"My dog has four legs. My cat has four legs. My dog loves car-rides; therefore, my cat must love car rides."

Look up the "fallacy of the undistributed middle", when you have a chance...
667 posted on 04/30/2015 1:00:00 PM PDT by paladinan (Rule #1: There is a God. Rule #2: It isn't you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 614 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson