With all due respect you don’t seem to understand the point being made here. You can claim all you want that any commentary you (or others) give after citing Scripture is “just Scripture) but it’s not. It’s your opinion OF Scripture and therefore:
It (your opinion) is infallible itself if YOU are infallible or...
It (your opinion) is NOT infallible UNLESS you are given, by the Holy Spirit, the charism of infallibility.
Again, put another way, unless you literally only post Scripture and NOTHING else, no commentary or conclusion by you or others, then you can’t claim “I’m only giving Scripture”. You’re not. You’re giving your INTERPRETATION of Scripture which is, itself, either fallible or infallible as described above.
By that analysis you must think you are infallible.
Pleas show where I have interpreted scripture.