[editor-surveyor]

sola Scriptura is merely recognition of the principles of all scripture.

Yeshua affirmed that Torah is eternal in Matthew 5. It will exist in force as long as time itself does.
.

[paladinan]

sola Scriptura is merely recognition of the principles of all scripture.

Erm... okay. Perhaps you might clarify that incredibly vague statement with something which explains what you actually MEAN, by that?

On that note: REJECTION of "sola Scriptura" is merely recognition of the fact that the Bible nowhere teaches it, and it's self-contradictory, and it's provable nonsense.

Yeshua affirmed that Torah is eternal in Matthew 5. It will exist in force as long as time itself does.

Right. No one's arguing with you, on that point. But surely you see the difference between "Scripture" and "Scripture ALONE"? It may interest you to know that Catholics object to the word "ALONE", and *NOT* to the word "Scripture"...

[paladinan]

That serpent’s breath is still with us!

If you keep smelling serpent breath, then you might want to get the serpent out of your room (and out of your face), FRiend. Just saying. :)

Seriously. I can understand how people can have strong feelings about these important issues, but: do you really think that this sort of tripe is helping the conversation at all?