Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Catholic Apologetics: Non-Catholics in the Communion Line
Catholic Answers ^ | April 15, 2015 | Michelle Arnold

Posted on 04/15/2015 1:38:52 PM PDT by NYer

There are usually a few Masses per year at which there can be expected to be a large number of non-Catholics present. Christmas and Easter Masses are popular with non-Catholics, mainly because they are visiting Catholic family and friends. Nuptial Masses, especially when one of the parties to be married is a non-Catholic Christian, will have large turnouts of non-Catholics (sometimes up to half the congregation). Non-Catholics can also be expected at Masses offered for other sacramental firsts and life-cycle events, such as confirmations and funerals.

This reality raises a common question for the apologists here at Catholic Answers: What should happen at Communion time? Here's a recent question I received on the issue.

At my granddaughter's First Communion, the priest announced that if there were any Episcopalians present they could receive Communion because they believe in the Real Presence. Other Protestants could come forward for a blessing. When did the teaching change on receiving Communion? I thought you had to be in full union with Rome. My son-in-law is Protestant and this caused real confusion for us.

In this case, both the priest and the inquirer were mistaken, to some extent, in their respective understandings of the Church's sacramental discipline.

The priest was incorrect that Episcopalians ordinarily may receive Communion at a Catholic Mass. Since Episcopalians do not have valid holy orders, they do not have a valid Communion. The fact that they believe that Jesus is in some way present in the Eucharist does not mean that they fully share Catholic faith in the nature of the Real Presence.

The inquirer also was not entirely correct that those who receive Communion must be "in full union with Rome." Orthodox Christians, and members of a few other Christian churches with valid holy orders and a valid Eucharist, are allowed to receive Communion when attending Catholic Masses. The Guidelines for the Reception of Communion state:

Members of the Orthodox churches, the Assyrian Church of the East, and the Polish National Catholic Church are urged to respect the discipline of their own churches. According to Roman Catholic discipline, the Code of Canon Law does not object to the reception of Communion by Christians of these churches (canon 844 §3).

Occasionally, under special circumstances, a baptized non-Catholic Christian may receive the Eucharist if there is grave need, the Christian "spontaneously asks" for the sacraments, and if he cannot approach his own minister:

Because Catholics believe that the celebration of the Eucharist is a sign of the reality of the oneness of faith, life, and worship, members of those churches with whom we are not yet fully united are ordinarily not admitted to holy Communion. Eucharistic sharing in exceptional circumstances by other Christians requires permission according to the directives of the diocesan bishop and the provisions of canon law (canon 844 §4) [Guidelines].

These guidelines, which are based on canon law, are rather complex and shot through with exceptions to the general principles. That can make it difficult for clergy and laity alike to offer blanket guidelines for reception of Communion when non-Catholics are present at a Catholic Mass.

And, all too often, off-the-cuff announcements made by the presider at Mass, usually right before Communion is distributed, do not accurately reflect the Church's discipline on reception of the Eucharist. It may be more common these days to hear a variant of the announcement quoted earlier, inviting "all who believe in the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist" to receive Communion, but the less-common announcement that "Communion is reserved to practicing Catholics in a state of grace" also is problematic.

What can be done? Here are a few suggestions for clergy and laity alike.

Learn the guidelines. I trust that clergy are fully instructed in the guidelines for reception of the sacraments while in seminary. But because the guidelines are not easily boiled down to either "Come one, come all" or "Practicing Catholics only!" then I can only suggest regular reading of the USCCB's Guidelines and the relevant section from canon law (canon 844). We have looked at the USCCB's summary; here is canon 844:

§1 Catholic ministers may lawfully administer the sacraments only to Catholic members of Christ's faithful, who equally may lawfully receive them only from Catholic ministers, except as provided in §2, 3, and 4 of this canon and in canon 861 §2.

§2 Whenever necessity requires or a genuine spiritual advantage commends it, and provided the danger of error or indifferentism is avoided, Christ's faithful for whom it is physically or morally impossible to approach a Catholic minister, may lawfully receive the sacraments of penance, the Eucharist, and anointing of the sick from non-Catholic ministers in whose churches these sacraments are valid [emphasis added].

§3 Catholic ministers may lawfully administer the sacraments of penance, the Eucharist, and anointing of the sick to members of the Eastern churches not in full communion with the Catholic Church, if they spontaneously ask for them and are properly disposed. The same applies to members of other churches which the Apostolic See judges to be in the same position as the aforesaid Eastern churches so far as the sacraments are concerned.

§4 If there is a danger of death or if, in the judgement of the diocesan bishop or of the episcopal conference, there is some other grave and pressing need, Catholic ministers may lawfully administer these same sacraments to other Christians not in full communion with the Catholic Church, who cannot approach a minister of their own community and who spontaneously ask for them, provided that they demonstrate the Catholic faith in respect of these sacraments and are properly disposed [emphasis added].

§5 In respect of the cases dealt with in §2, 3, and 4, the diocesan bishop or the episcopal conference is not to issue general norms except after consultation with the competent authority, at least at the local level, of the non-Catholic church or community concerned.

Given the importance of access to the sacraments by all those duly permitted and properly disposed to receive them, Catholic and non-Catholic alike, I do not think it is unreasonable to recommend that priests and deacons memorize this canon and the USCCB's Guidelines. Or, if memorization is impossible, clergy can print out both the canon and the Guidelines on the front and back of a laminated card and keep it on their person at all times, as police officers do with The Miranda Warning.

Publish the guidelines. The missalettes used in many American Catholic parishes often print the USCCB's Guidelines, usually on the inside front cover. If a parish uses a missalette that has the USCCB's Guidelines available, great. If not, then contact the USCCB and request permission to reprint the Guidelines onto card stock to create a sturdy insert that can be placed inside all of the parish's missalettes. Extras can be placed in the parish's literature racks.

Promote the guidelines. Once a parish has determined where its copies of the Guidelines are—whether they are already printed in the parish missalettes or are printed by the parish on card stock and placed in the missalettes—the parish can create a plan of action for promoting the Guidelines at liturgies where non-Catholics are expected to be present. For example, a regular announcement before Masses offered at Christmas, Easter, and for weddings and funerals can be to direct the congregation's attention to the Guidelines and ask the congregation to read the Guidelines before the liturgy begins. For example:

Before we begin, we would like to direct your attention to the Guidelines for Reception of Communion, which can be found on the inside front-cover of the missalettes placed in the pew pockets in front of you. Please take a moment to read the Guidelines so that you may properly discern whether or not you are able to receive Communion during this liturgy. We welcome all who are unable to receive Communion to offer silent prayer or personal reflection during the Rite of Communion.

Nota bene: The announcement suggested here (my own wording, which may be revised appropriately at the discretion of clergy) is not an open call to receive Communion, nor does it make assumptions about who is properly disposed to receive. It simply directs all present to read the Church's guidelines for receiving Communion and to discern their own preparedness for reception. No assumptions are made about the personal religious convictions of those visiting, some of whom may either not be comfortable praying in common with Christians or may not even be theists (which is why the invitation to "personal reflection" is extended).

When the Church's guidelines are not heeded

Despite all of these precautions, there may be times when someone who in not properly disposed to receive Communion receives Communion anyway. It is more likely that a layperson will notice this than will a member of the clergy.

Clergy have the authority to counsel people not to receive Communion; laypersons have the authority to make the guidelines for receiving Communion known. In a previous blog post, I offered these suggestions to laity concerned about the proper reception of Communion by non-practicing Catholics or non-Catholics:

Bottom line: We must accept that human persons have free will, and may freely choose to use it either positively or negatively. We can offer information. When we have the authority to do so, we can counsel accordingly. In a few individual cases, it may be that ecclesial authorities can take more drastic steps to protect the Blessed Sacrament from unworthy reception.

But there is only so much we can do to inform, counsel, and instruct. In the end, ultimate responsibility for worthy reception of Communion belongs to the individual communicant. We can trust that God knows that communicant's mind and heart, and that he will respond to that person accordingly.

In order that this judgment [by the Lord] be favorable or rather that I be not judged at all, I want to be charitable in my thoughts toward others at all times, for Jesus has said, "Judge not, and you shall not be judged" (St. Therese of Lisieux).



TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Religion & Culture; Worship
KEYWORDS: catholicanswers; catholicapologetics; communionline; holycommunion; michellearnold; noncatholics; wannabecatholics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-151 next last
To: Lonely Bull

The problem with categorizing some sin as lesser is that it could too easily lead men to take sin too lightly, as I have seen many a Catholic do in my stint in Catholicism.


121 posted on 04/16/2015 6:19:11 PM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone; metmom; NYer; NKP_Vet; boatbums
NKP-vet is partially correct and metmom is completely wrong.

There are exactly 8 reasons for Latae sententiae, sentence (already) passed, or automatic ex-communication. Sodomy is not one of them.

It is going to be interesting to see if metmom will admit her error, or try to switch the topic as she has already attempted to do once already.

It will also be interesting to see if any of the non-Catholics will publically call her on bearing false witness.

122 posted on 04/16/2015 6:52:00 PM PDT by verga (I might as well be playing chess with pigeons,.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Where does bearing false witness land a person?


123 posted on 04/16/2015 6:53:32 PM PDT by verga (I might as well be playing chess with pigeons,.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: verga; metmom; NYer
NKP-vet is partially correct and metmom is completely wrong. There are exactly 8 reasons for Latae sententiae, sentence (already) passed, or automatic ex-communication. Sodomy is not one of them.

It is going to be interesting to see if metmom will admit her error, or try to switch the topic as she has already attempted to do once already.

It will also be interesting to see if any of the non-Catholics will publically call her on bearing false witness.

That chess game must be a quick one for the pigeons.

>NYER:Now if this baby-killer or sodomite is practicing this sin, or if these same persons are politicians that believe in these sins and promote these sins, THEY HAVE EXCOMMUNICATED THEMSELVES and if they present themselves for communion GOD KNOWS they are committing a mortal sin by partaking in Holy Communion.<

124 posted on 04/16/2015 7:15:16 PM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: kearnyirish2
f the Orthodox referred to their Churches as “Orthodox Catholic Churches” then I would include them under “Catholic”. They don’t, so I don’t.

Who says they do not?

Eastern Orthodoxy, official name Orthodox Catholic Church, one of the three major doctrinal and jurisdictional groups of Christianity. - http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/177174/Eastern-Orthodoxy

One of the three branches of world Christianity and the major Christian church in the Middle East and Eastern Europe, the Orthodox church, also sometimes called the Eastern church, or the Greek Orthodox, or Orthodox Catholic church, claims to have preserved the original and apostolic Christian faith. Figures for its worldwide membership range from 100 to 200 million, depending on the method of accounting. - John Meyendorff (http://mb-soft.com/believe/txc/orthodox.htm), a leading theologian of the Orthodox Church as well as a writer and teacher. Meyendorff served as the Dean of St. Vladimir's Orthodox Theological Seminary in the United States until June 30.. 1992. - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Meyendorff

Sometimes the Orthodox Church is also called the Eastern Orthodox Church, or the Oriental Church, or the Christian Church of the East, or the Orthodox Catholic Church, or the Graeco-Russian Church. But once more, these are all different names for the same Church. - https://oca.org/questions/teaching/what-is-the-proper-name-for-the-orthodox-church

125 posted on 04/16/2015 7:18:51 PM PDT by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: NYer

the celebrant at any of these events should make it VERY CLEAR that ONLY Catholics who are worthy should recieve communion...and the rest should respect that admonition.


126 posted on 04/16/2015 7:22:41 PM PDT by terycarl (common sense prevails over all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: verga

You’ll find out soon enough if you don’t know by now.


127 posted on 04/16/2015 7:32:00 PM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
I have no desire to stand in a “communion line” in a Roman church...that bread is a demonic idol..

The Body and Blood of our Savior Jesus Christ is a demonic idol??

See, your decision was a really bad one and in a thousand years you will never be able to justify it.....but you can keep trying I guess.

128 posted on 04/16/2015 7:36:23 PM PDT by terycarl (common sense prevails over all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone
Wow....and here I was thinking Communion was open to anyone who professed faith in Christ as it is a remembrance of Him.

In your church it may be a remembrance...In the Catholic church it is HIM.

129 posted on 04/16/2015 7:42:06 PM PDT by terycarl (common sense prevails over all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: terycarl

Guess that verse about, “do this in remembrance of Me” doesn’t matter.


130 posted on 04/16/2015 7:43:15 PM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

And?


131 posted on 04/16/2015 7:43:30 PM PDT by verga (I might as well be playing chess with pigeons,.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
I have a non-catholic protestant friend who is married to a catholic and he receives holy communion when he attends mass with his wife.

He shouldn't, and she should know better and tell him so.

132 posted on 04/16/2015 7:45:40 PM PDT by terycarl (common sense prevails over all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Lapsed Catholics claim they know it all. So tell us.


133 posted on 04/16/2015 7:48:50 PM PDT by NKP_Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

“NKP-vet is partially correct and metmom is completely wrong”

Partially correct? Try 100% correct.


134 posted on 04/16/2015 7:50:59 PM PDT by NKP_Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

Comment #135 Removed by Moderator

To: metmom
You were aware, weren’t you, that the penalty for ALL sin is death?

Isn't denial of Christ's true church a sin??

136 posted on 04/16/2015 8:09:34 PM PDT by terycarl (common sense prevails over all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone
Guess that verse about, “do this in remembrance of Me” doesn’t matter.

It certainly does, and the "this" that He was referring to is the transubstantiation of the bread and wine into His Body and Blood....THIS IS MY BODY...is pretty plain to me.

137 posted on 04/16/2015 8:14:26 PM PDT by terycarl (common sense prevails over all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: metmom
So where in Scripture is a list of the sins that lead to death and the ones that don’t?

As I said in my last post, I have looked before but have never found one.

(This apparent absence of a list interests me. I just noticed that here we have an example of something that may concern those of us who identify as Christians, but there may be no obvious scriptural list or set of criteria that would help us determine what fits in whatever category.)

Where did the Catholic church get its list of *mortal* and *venial* sin?

I'd ask.

You were aware, weren’t you, that the penalty for ALL sin is death?

I was going to mention a few citations along those lines, but even so there's this distinction in 1 John. It's been interpreted in various ways, and I'm not promoting any particular interpretation of what the distinction is--but there is a biblical distinction made.

138 posted on 04/16/2015 9:53:45 PM PDT by Lonely Bull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: terycarl
.and the rest should respect that admonition.

And if they don't, how is the priest to know?

139 posted on 04/17/2015 4:14:16 AM PDT by NYer ("You are a puff of smoke that appears briefly and then disappears." James 4:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: CommerceComet; xone
Not according to Luke 22:20-21

THIS cup??

It was the Passover meal; right?

What NEW ceremony was instituted?

140 posted on 04/17/2015 4:35:06 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-151 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson