Posted on 04/10/2015 6:19:36 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o
The argument that divorced and civilly remarried Catholics (lacking annulments) be allowed to receive the Eucharist is kind of like 40+ year-old, re-heated mashed potatoes: it’s been spit out by the authority of Church time and again, but for some reason keeps appearing on the spoon of stubborn theologians and bishops who keep trying to trick us into eating it by making cutesie airplane noises.
In an essay for Communio entitled “The Merciful Gift Of Indissolubility and the Question Of Pastoral Care For Civilly Divorced And Remarried Catholics”, Nicholas J. Healy, JR. traces the history of this argument, as well as four of the main times the Church has lovingly but resoundingly shut it down. I’ve listed my findings from the document below in order to provide some context for this issue that’s sure to arise once again at the October 2015 Synod on the Family.
1. 1965 and Vatican II:
The argument for allowing communion in certain circumstances to divorced and remarried Catholics can be traced back, at least in recent history, to the fourth session of the Second Vatican Council. Archbishop Elias Zoghby, the patriarchal vicar of the Melkites in Egypt, proposed that the Eastern practice of tolerating remarriage in certain cases should be considered. Even though Zobhby triggered a swift and negative response, dissenters still use this instance as an example in their favor.
Shut down by Pope Paul VI: "... the Church has no authority to change what is of divine law."
At the request of Pope Paul VI, all normal activities of the Council were suspended until the proposal was addressed. Cardinal Journet was asked by the Pope to respond to Zoghby, and citing Mk 10:2 and 1 Cor 7:10–11, he concluded that “the teaching of the Catholic Church on the indissolubility of sacramental marriage is the very teaching of the Lord Jesus that has been revealed to us and has always been safeguarded and proclaimed in the Church . . . the Church has no authority to change what is of divine law.”
2. 1970s: Dissent from Catholic Theological Society
Despite the Church’s response at the Second Vatican Council, the 1970s saw a barrage of publications from Catholic theologians and bishops advocating for a change in Church teaching, particularly in the United States and in Germany. In 1972, a study committee commissioned by the Catholic Theological Society of America issued an “Interim Pastoral Statement” on “The Problem of Second Marriages,” arguing that not only should the divorced and remarried be admitted back to the sacraments, but that the Church needed to rethink and redefine the very ideas of consummation and indissolubility. That same year in Germany, several prominent bishops and theologians such as Schnackenburg, Ratzinger*, Lehmann, and Böckle wrote volumes on the matter, arguing for leniency in certain circumstances similar to practices in the Orthodox Church (called oikonomia, which roughly translates to “stewardship” or “management of a household”).
*Cardinal Ratzinger, now Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI, officially retracted his support of communion for the divorced and remarried in a letter published in The Tablet in 1991, and has several times since voiced his support for Church teaching as expressed in “Familiaris Consortio”.
The Church holds a Synod on the Family in 1980, as divorces were on the rise throughout the world. The result of the 1980 Synod was Pope John Paul II’s 1981 apostolic exhortation “Familiaris Consortio” (roughly, “Of Family Partnership”), which contains beautiful reflections on the role of the family in God’s divine plan, and specifically includes a section about irregular situations. Addressing the situation of the divorced and civilly remarried, Pope John Paul II says the following:
Together with the Synod, I earnestly call upon pastors and the whole community of the faithful to help the divorced, and with solicitous care to make sure that they do not consider themselves as separated from the Church, for as baptized persons they can, and indeed must, share in her life. They should be encouraged to listen to the word of God, to attend the Sacrifice of the Mass, to persevere in prayer, to contribute to works of charity and to community efforts in favor of justice, to bring up their children in the Christian faith, to cultivate the spirit and practice of penance and thus implore, day by day, God’s grace. Let the Church pray for them, encourage them and show herself a merciful mother, and thus sustain them in faith and hope.
However, the Church reaffirms her practice, which is based upon Sacred Scripture, of not admitting to Eucharistic Communion divorced persons who have remarried. They are unable to be admitted thereto from the fact that their state and condition of life objectively contradict that union of love between Christ and the Church which is signified and effected by the Eucharist. Besides this, there is another special pastoral reason: if these people were admitted to the Eucharist, the faithful would be led into error and confusion regarding the Church’s teaching about the indissolubility of marriage.
Shut down by Pope John Paul II: "...the Church reaffirms her practice, which is based upon Sacred Scripture,"
The Church holds a Synod on the Family in 1980, as divorces were on the rise throughout the world. The result of the 1980 Synod was Pope John Paul II’s 1981 apostolic exhortation “Familiaris Consortio” (roughly, “Of Family Partnership”), which contains beautiful reflections on the role of the family in God’s divine plan, and specifically includes a section about irregular situations. Addressing the situation of the divorced and civilly remarried, Pope John Paul II says the following:
Together with the Synod, I earnestly call upon pastors and the whole community of the faithful to help the divorced, and with solicitous care to make sure that they do not consider themselves as separated from the Church, for as baptized persons they can, and indeed must, share in her life. They should be encouraged to listen to the word of God, to attend the Sacrifice of the Mass, to persevere in prayer, to contribute to works of charity and to community efforts in favor of justice, to bring up their children in the Christian faith, to cultivate the spirit and practice of penance and thus implore, day by day, God’s grace. Let the Church pray for them, encourage them and show herself a merciful mother, and thus sustain them in faith and hope.
However, the Church reaffirms her practice, which is based upon Sacred Scripture, of not admitting to Eucharistic Communion divorced persons who have remarried. They are unable to be admitted thereto from the fact that their state and condition of life objectively contradict that union of love between Christ and the Church which is signified and effected by the Eucharist. Besides this, there is another special pastoral reason: if these people were admitted to the Eucharist, the faithful would be led into error and confusion regarding the Church’s teaching about the indissolubility of marriage.
3. 1993: Dissent from German theologians
Three prominent German bishops, Oskar Saier, Walter Kasper, and Karl Lehmann, publish a letter in 1993 on pastoral care for the divorced and remarried, essentially saying that while what Pope John Paul II said in Familiaris Consortio is very nice and generally true, it can’t possibly apply to every difficult situation that arises. These bishops then proposed their own guide for divorced and remarried Catholics to determine their worthiness for the sacraments, as guided by a pastor. There were three conditions the German bishops laid out for the possibility of communion: the individuals should be repentant for the failure of the first marriage; the second civil marriage has to “prove itself over time as stable”; and the “commitments assumed in the second marriage have to be accepted.” Under these conditions, the bishops argued, civilly remarried people could in good conscience receive the Eucharist without the need to live continently.
Shut it down: In 1994, The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith reaaffirms Catholic teaching
The CDF (Congregation n the Doctrine of the Faith) in 1994 issued an indirect response to the German bishops in the “Letter Concerning Communion”, which said church teaching “cannot be modified for difficult situations.” While it never mentioned the letter from the German bishops, it was clearly written in response to it. The Congregation’s letter cited passages from Scripture, Familiaris Consortio, and the Catechism of the Catholic Church to support Church teaching, and addressed false notions of conscience that would allow individuals to determine for themselves whether or not their first marriage was valid.
4. 1994-2005: Various bishops continue call to re-open the discussion
Literature published by various bishops and theologians still showed a tendency to stray from Pope John Paul II’s teaching in “Familiaris Consortio”, leading the Church to call for a Synod on the Eucharist in 2005, during which the issue was studied and addressed extensively.
Shut it down: Pope Benedict XVI - Sacamentus Caritatus
Pope Benedict XVI issued a post-Synod apostolic exhortation called “Sacramentum Caritatis”, in which he confirmed Church doctrine and practice. He also called for a deeper theological understanding of the relationship between the sacrament of marriage and the sacrament of the and the sacrament of the Eucharist, and asked for better pastoral efforts in the area of marriage preparation for young people.
There are two important things to remember when considering this issue. The first is that the pain and separation felt by divorced and remarried Catholics is real, and the exhortation of the recent Popes to reach out to these people in the Church should be taken seriously by clergy and lay faithful alike. The second thing to remember is that while the pain of the divorced and remarried is a serious issue, it is not the only important and pressing issue in the Church at the moment, with thousands of Christians fleeing their homes or being slaughtered at the hands of Islamic extremists both in the Middle East and Africa.
Shut it down: the Holy Spirit will move, as He always has, to protect Catholic doctrine and unity
Still, because the issue continues to arise, the Synod Fathers will address it at the Synod on the Family later this year, and Pope Francis will write an apostolic exhortation on the matter some time after that. Let us continue to pray for all in Church leadership, and that those in authority have the courage to trust that the Holy Spirit will shut it down, as he has always done when erroneous proposals threaten Church doctrine and unity.
Your weak arguments have become repetitive and tiresome. I know for a fact that the tranny was engaged to a member of the same sex during her correspondence with the pope and at the time of their personal encounter. I have no idea of when she goes to confession.
Nancy Pelosi and Joe Biden may go to Confession weekly for all I know. Do I think they're repentant? No!
Francis and Lombardi are both Jesuits. Why did neither of them deny the published content of the phone call if it was false? I understand doctrine was not determined by a personal phone call, but discipline, for that particular sinner, was lacking.
I think Pope Francis is sometimes impulsive in his communications, and naive about how it will play out in public. Since he's not going to disclose line-by-line what he said the woman, and how it conceivably differs from what her husband put on Facebook, he subsequently had to face the natural consequences of his blathering.
The most he could do for damage-control was to say, "This is not doctrine or discipline." OH-kaaayyy.
I miss Pope Brenedict's self-discipline and precision.
Pope Francis compares arguments for transgender rights to nuclear arms race
The money quote:
"[Pope Francis] said every historical period has "Herods" that "destroy, that plot designs of death, that disfigure the face of man and woman, destroying creation."Let's think of the nuclear arms, of the possibility to annihilate in a few instants a very high number of human beings," he was quoted as saying. "Let's think also of genetic manipulation, of the manipulation of life, or of the gender theory, that does not recognize the order of creation."
"With this attitude, man commits a new sin, that against God the Creator. The true custody of creation does not have anything to do with the ideologies that consider man like an accident, like a problem to eliminate. "God has placed man and woman and the summit of creation and has entrusted them with the earth. The design of the Creator is written in nature." The interview was conducted in October and major parts of it were published online in January. However, it was only recently picked up by the English-language press.
[Gee, I wonder why...]
In the case of Biden and Pelosi, we do know: because their offenses were public, and often part of their official legislative goals as programs and policy preferences.
They would have to make amends for this public scandal by means of a public recantation. If they do not, we are right to regard them as being unrepentant.
I do know. And I don’t appreciate you insinuating that I’m a liar.
You said, "I have no idea of when she goes to confession."
And I said, "In other words, in the case of the tranny, you don't know."
I'm agreeing with you that you "have no idea." That's not insinuating that you're a liar.
I'm not that good at insinuations., If I want to call someone a liar, I'll generally do it straight out.
No, I think you just know how to get around the forum rules.
Wow, suckered right into a change of subject.
This is nuts. I’m outta here.
Check the post. Kennedy’s not mine, liberal abortion pushers was mine.
Nevertheless, the solution in every case is repentance, Confession --- THEN Communion.
Communion without repentance is a dangerous delusion: it's another meathook in your soul, dragging you down to destruction. Anyone who had even a bit of love in their heart for a fellow sinner, would try to tell them the truth about this.
“Communion without repentance is a dangerous delusion: it’s another meathook in your soul, dragging you down to destruction. Anyone who had even a bit of love in their heart for a fellow sinner, would try to tell them the truth about this.”
But someone who cares about fellow sinners would want to be Biblically accurate. In this case, what is represented by the Catholic denomination and promoted in your post is not the truth in a multitude of ways. This leaves the person not only out of fellowship, but not understanding the truth.
Well ((((sigh)))) tell me where my post was in error, then.
Well, do you really want to detail it all?
The Roman teaching on the topic of divorce is like many topics - a verse or two without a systematic exposition. the post and comments go downhill from there.
Really, your best bet is to just send all sinners to a local Protestant church that loves Christ in word and deed, teaches and loves all of revelation consequently loves sinners to Christ. Sinners will be welcomed and taught what they need to reconcile with him, have eternal life, walk with Him daily and mature.
Please send us all the sinners. Send us the pierced, tattooed, broken, the adulterers, etc. We’ll take them all. We will start where they are at and lead them to Him.
........................................................
“Straightening up, Jesus said to her, “Woman, where are they? Did no one condemn you?” She said, “No one, Lord.” And Jesus said, “I do not condemn you, either. Go. From now on sin no more.”
I invite you --- and all of the others you mentioned --- to come on down to the Catholic Church! Come one, come all!
I can imagine this do-si-do going on for quite some time.
:o)
It seems simple to me.
Not always easy, but simple it is. Let's encourage each other, fellow sinners, to find Him who is the Way.
Let’s split ‘em up!
Send us sinners.
We’ll send you perfect people.
:-)
And I am sincere.
Cue "Catholics Come Home" promo...
Whatever happened to that series of "The doors of the Church are open" commercials? I can't find them anywhere.
Is that TV? Everywhere, or just your diocese? I can’t answer your question. I haven’t watched TV since I can’t remember when.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.