Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Mrs. Don-o
Then Pope Francis, through Lombardi, acknowledged that a phone conversation took place, but more than that he could not say, explaining it was not an official act in any sense, but private.

Francis and Lombardi are both Jesuits. Why did neither of them deny the published content of the phone call if it was false? I understand doctrine was not determined by a personal phone call, but discipline, for that particular sinner, was lacking.

62 posted on 04/11/2015 11:45:03 AM PDT by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: ebb tide
"... discipline, for that particular sinner, was lacking. "

I think Pope Francis is sometimes impulsive in his communications, and naive about how it will play out in public. Since he's not going to disclose line-by-line what he said the woman, and how it conceivably differs from what her husband put on Facebook, he subsequently had to face the natural consequences of his blathering.

The most he could do for damage-control was to say, "This is not doctrine or discipline." OH-kaaayyy.

I miss Pope Brenedict's self-discipline and precision.

63 posted on 04/11/2015 11:57:01 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("Let us commend ourselves and each other, and all our life unto Christ our God." Liturgy of St.John)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson