So I ask again..did Jesus and the apostles eat the REAL, ACTUAL , PHYSICAL body of Christ at the last supper? What part did they eat that He did not need?
He was naked on that cross and there is no mention of anything "missing"
Lets stick to the topic and not go down some bunny trails
Did the apostles eat the REAL, ACTUAL,PHYSICAL body of Christ at the last passover? How did they do that?
It’s interesting that we never get an answer to that.
What a fine example of needing a posse to help bury the Truth that someone doesn't want to accept.
Yes, they ate the real, actual, physical, body of Christ because Jesus Christ Himself, God incarnate, The Word made flesh, said, This IS my body.
Looks like when it comes to believing what Jesus Christ Himself said, "Faith Alone" boils down to "Faith that ain't Faith at all" which is in reality, as always,
Faith in Self and Self Alone
the real cornerstone of all Protestant and Protestant derived doctrine.
"Christians" who refuse to accept the words of Christ Himself are interesting, to say the least.
Paul in Corinthians says:
23For I received from the Lord what I also delivered to you, that the Lord Jesus on the night when he was betrayed took bread, 24and when he had given thanks, he broke it, and said, “This is my body which is fore you. Do this in remembrance of me.”f 25In the same way also he took the cup, after supper, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me.” 26For as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until he comes."
He received from the Lord -- "for as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup..."
Sounds like the disciples ate bread and drank wine and not the actual flesh and blood of Christ as inspired by The Lord himself to Paul.
I would think if Christ was being literal, there would have been nothing of his body left to crucify. I don't understand why some denominations have an issue understanding this -- don't you?
Hoss
Good Question!!!!!!!