For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who doubt, no proof is sufficient.
There has been no confirmation whatsoever, with the initial info coming from conditions which can be termed "hinky".
As far as the Shroud info goes --- if the one Shroud which has remained is what it is purported by some to be, from among a few or more which once existed and were all claimed to be the burial shroud of Christ, then by default that would prove that all but the one were and had been frauds --- all along.
That aspect additionally supports some of my own own contentions which I presented to you in regards to there having long been frauds and pretenders among that which looked upon as "relic".
Meanwhile, if all you have to say is along the lines of what you just did -- then spare me any further of that sort of pathetic noise. You had been saying "science", which is supposed to stand as irrefutable fact -- and was the way which you had presented it.
But now, the tune has suddenly changed and has included unstated but possibly intended to be implied accusation(?) if so -- the you can go stuff that accusation.
I can't stand that sort of cop-out response (with a side of insult?) not when there are multiple issues at hand...