Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: zot
It looked that way until it was proved that the sample used for carbon dating was taken from a patch and not from the shroud material.

Actually it was a combination of original Shroud AND 16th Century patch material that varied from 60% to 40% patch depending on where on the original sample the sub-samples were cut. This resulted in the variation in dating reported by the three testing labs results in the four sub-samples tested which did not overlap in their degrees of confidence. THAT should have been a big red-flag that something was wrong.

28 posted on 03/27/2015 4:04:10 PM PDT by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users contnue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Swordmaker

Thanks for the further explanation at your post # 28.

I have read that the interwoven material in the patch was cotton, not linen, which was proved because it glowed under ultraviolet light.


38 posted on 03/27/2015 5:37:06 PM PDT by zot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson