Posted on 03/16/2015 4:21:19 PM PDT by NYer
The Democratic Party is facing a Catholic apocalypse, Patricia Miller warns at Salon.
Her article does a good job of marshaling statistics, but when she assesses the reasons for the apocalypse she makes a critical error.
White Catholics are now identifying as Republicans by historic margins, she says, and lists the evidence.
She cites Pew data showing that 53% of white Catholics favor the GOP, versus 39% who favor Democrats.
Catholics voted for John McCain over Barack Obama in 2008s presidential race by 5 percentage points, she says but chose Mitt Romney over Obama by 19 points four years later, she says.
The U.S. House has gone from a Catholic Democrat bastian in 2009 with 98 Catholic Democrats and 37 Catholic Republicans to having more Catholic Republicans than Catholic Democrats for the first time ever in 2015 though only barely; 69 to 68.
Between 2009 and 2014 the number of white Catholics who thought the White House was unfriendly to religious doubled from 17% to 36%, according to Pew, says Miller.
The article looks for blame for the sudden shift, and offers a few ideas. It could be the bishops who say you cant support Democrats because of abortion. It could be that left-leaning Catholics are leaving the Church, leaving only conservative Catholics in the fold. It could be that bishops (every bishop, by the way) are in her words demonizing the HHS mandate the federal mandate that says Catholic employers must violate their consciences or face crippling fines.
Last, she cites Pew data showing Catholics wanting more conservative spending and immigration policies to say it could be the Tea Party-ization of white Catholics.
She is right. It could be any of those outside influences changing the dynamic.
But the only group missing from her list of possible suspects is the most likely culprit: the Democratic Party itself.
First, on abortion, the Democratic Party has changed dramatically. Bill Clinton, Al Gore, Ted Kennedy and Jesse Jackson all started out supporting the right to life. Democrats for Life powerfully make the case that liberals should be pro-life. But the partys harsh stand against the right to life has left it hemorrhaging people of conscience for a long time.
Princetons Robbie George left the party over abortion decades ago. Jo Ann Nardelli, an important Democratic organizer who had close ties to the late Gov. Bob Casey of Pennsylvania over social issues. Bishop Thomas Tobin left in 2013, giving up all hope for reform in the party.
For years, the Clintonian formula allowed Democrats to believe they wanted abortion to be safe, legal and rare. Kermit Gosnell did away with the safe part . The 2012 Democratic platform did away with the rare part. Now all that is left is the legal part.
Just last week, Democrats killed a bill against human-trafficking because it didnt pay federal money to abortion businesses. It is hard to accept a party that would do that, and many people simply wont.
But Miller misses two other key factors in Catholic defections.
First: War.
Catholics dont only care about abortion. As the Financial Times wrote in 2008, Pennsylvania swung away from the Republicans over the Iraq war.
What did Catholics get for their votes? Under Obamas watch, U.S. kill teams in Afghanistan made international headlines. The administrations violence created chaos in Libya and our premature exit from Iraq created an opening for ISIS, and the Obama administration shamefully redefined civilian to justify his own drone policy.
Catholics who voted for Obama got more abortion, less religious liberty, and more violence worldwide.
Second: Latinos.
By stressing white Catholics, the article doesnt mention that Latino Catholics are also not a cinch for the Democratic Party.
When party-switcher New Mexico Gov. Susana Martinez said, Ill be damned, were Republicans she was describing a feeling others may be having. Latinos were not the shoe-in they were supposed to be for Democrats last November.
Its no wonder: Latinos are more pro-life in polls than the general population.
But one thing Miller totally gets right is that the changing dynamic heralds more changes to come.
The shift in the Catholic vote should really be a wakeup call to the Democrats, she quotes Democratic activist Steve Krueger saying. White Catholics are 18 percent of the electorate and Catholics vote 1 to 2 percentage points above their representation in the overall population. This is a significant voting bloc that now perceives Republicans as being more welcoming to people of faith.
I'll try to remember this...
Leftists took over by taking control of education and the news media. Perhaps we should start by taking them back.
So you DO know the solution after all!
That’s my best idea for a solution, I just have don’t have a great plan right now.
It will require constant challenging of the now status-quo, which I do at every opportunity. But I’m one person.
I think a concerted plan would be to create a real action group directed at the long term, not the short term (getting one guy or group of guys elected). Run real public serice commericials on TV, radio, and in social media, with the purpose of really educating the citizenry about personal liberty and the inherent value of the individual. Not feel good splashes buty 1-2 minute presentations that build on each other. Strong ideology.
It would take billions of dollars a year for 10-20 years to really change hearts and minds. Where does that money come from?
1. Us. 10 million people donating $500 a year is $5 billion.
2. Rich people. Not enough of them, not enough money in their pockets, and rich people want to run the show.
3. Republicans in power. One would think that educating the public about American History and good citizenship is every bit as valid a use of public funds as anti-smoking and global warming PSAs. Ditto for textbooks, grant monies, etc.
4. The Left uses Feminist groups, Environment groups, etc. as wedges to it greater socialis effort. Contitutionalist could coordinate the same. A coalition of Christian churches running pieces on the importance of religious freedom, the NRA, etc. All tying in to the central message of personal worth, peronal responsibility, and personal liberty.
I'm sorry, he did what now?
Oh; I see...
Gotta just LOVE that Book of Abraham!!
Figure | Joseph Smith Explanation[52] | Explanation by non-Mormon and Mormon Egyptologists (quotes are from Deveria)[25][43][53] |
---|---|---|
1 | Kolob, signifying the first creation, nearest to the celestial, or the residence of God. First in government, the last pertaining to the measurement of time. The measurement according to celestial time, which celestial time signifies one day to a cubit. One day in Kolob is equal to a thousand years according to the measurement of this earth, which is called by the Egyptians Jah-oh-eh. | "The spirit of the four elements (according to Champollion), or rather of the four winds, or the four cardinal points; the soul of the terrestrial world. This god is always represented with four rams' heads, and his image has certainly been altered here. They have also evidently made a very clumsy attempt at copying the double human head of the god figured above, fig. 2, instead of the four rams' heads. The word Jah-oh-eh has nothing Egyptian in it; it resembles the Hebrew word [redacted] badly transcribed." (emphasis in original) The name hieroglyph above the central figure is Chnm-Re, the Egyptian "First Creator" god who organized everything out of the primordial chaos. |
I'd keep it separate too!!
Color coding explanation:
Added stuff... Changed stuff... Rearranged stuff... Removed stuff...
*(UNDERLINED stuff is the DISTRACTING reference on every tenth word or so that infuses LDS 'scripture' online.)
|
I'm sorry; But I could NOT find the Inspired version listed there.
Is the JST really Mormon approved scripture or not?
Faulty; but true.
Cool!
I DO?
that's TERRIBLE!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.