Is he feeling a sense of abandonment yet?
Posted on 03/07/2015 7:05:23 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
The Anti-Defamation League condemned Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan as the “leading anti-Semite in America” after a speech in which he blamed “Israelis and Zionist Jews” for the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
“At a time when anti-Semitic attitudes are at historic lows, Farrakhan’s unabashed promotion of anti-Semitism is a throwback to the intolerance of another era,” ADL National Director Abraham Foxman said in a statement issued Thursday.
Farrakhan, who has a long history of anti-Semitic remarks, delivered his speech Sunday in Chicago as part of his Saviors Day 2015 sermon.
“It is now becoming apparent that there were many Israelis and Zionist Jews in the key roles of the 9/11 attacks,” Farrakhan said. “If they can prove me wrong, I’ll pay with my life, since they want to kill me anyway. Prove me wrong. We’re dealing with thieves and liars and murderers.”
Some of Farrakhan’s other claims in that speech relating to Sept. 11 include that “an Israeli film crew dressed as Arabs were filming the Twin Towers before the first plane went in” and “many Jews received a text message not to come to work on Sept. 11.”
Farrakhan’s religious group Nation of Islam, once led by Malcolm X, is labeled as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center. Farrakhan left the group in 2007 due to health problems but has continued to give public speeches promoting anti-Semitic claims in recent years.
print out a Farrahkan speech and an Iranian Mullah speech and a (socalled) Palestinian Islamonazi speech and a Farrahkan speech and a Sharpton speech.... in a hat...without labels
draw one text out
try to figure out who’s speech it is
(figure you’ve got a 20 percent chance)
Is there such a thing as abuse of free speech and who determines where the line is drawn?
This guy has been running his mouth for years and no one dares to challenge him because of his “color and religion”.
Yes, with him it’s always the evil Joooooooooooooooz....
hes a self Desribed.....unbeknownst to HIM slef described HUCKSTER!
he said to in his inane rambling disjointed speech!
“and Hucksters....Thats who we are”
we should be thinking the poor dumb clumsy schmuck for finally coming clean!!
Imus said, after watching farrakans last week rant, which was just nuts, ‘ I be lovin me some Louis. If you’re going to be insane you gotta be insane like Louis F’
It’s the only thing one can say. He’s just so nuts. Why does he get air time ?
you know,
raving lunatics like this never used to get Mass Media Headlines
(if they were lucky, they’d just get confined and some good treatment maybe)
(something’s changed...where our media now considers itself the mouthpiece for the mad and rabid, the liars and corruptoids, and any anti-American ranter who happens to fall off the bus)
Ah, the pesky Joooooooooooos control everything.
OK. Sure.
Sounds like a hate crime to me! Calling Holder, Mr Eric Holder please pick up the red courtesy phone.....
Barry Huckster Obummer.
Thats him!
hes made a new name...for himself...and one we KNOW to be authentic..to boot!
Farrakhan is nothing but a rabid black racist dog. Anyone who would give him credence or airtime should have their head examined. His message is for those as deranged as he is.
Farrakhan is only relative to the news media And self hating whites. To everyone else, he does not exist.
This nut is still alive? Wasn’t he supposed to croak years ago? Or was that just a fund-raising stunt? Never mind, I figured it out myself.
Looney Louie, reporting from the Mutha Ship.
Judge Andrew Napolitano: Another 9/11 Truther on Fox’s Staff?
By Lachlan Markay | November 30, 2010 | 11:35 AM EST
Fox News apparently employs a pair of 9/11 “Truthers”: Geraldo Rivera, host of FNC’s “Geraldo at Large”, and, we’ve recently discovered, Judge Andrew Napolitano, who hosts “Freedom Watch” on the Fox Business Network.
Both Napolitano and Rivera have, er, raised questions about the “official” (read: commonsensical) explanation for the collapse of the WTC7 building on September 11, 2001. This conspiracy theory has been thoroughly debunked a number of times. Apparently Geraldo and the Judge are not convinced.
Geraldo left his Truther endorsement a bit more open-ended. “I’m certainly much more open-minded about it than I was,” he said in his eight-minute segment on the issue a couple weeks ago.
Judge Napolitano was a bit more explicit in his discussion with Truther guru and ubiquitous conspiracy theorist Alex Jones:
It’s hard for me to believe that [WTC7] came down by itself. I was gratified to see Geraldo Rivera investigating it. I’m gratified to see the people across the border interested.
I think 20 years from now, people will look at 9/11 the way they look at the assassination of JFK today. It couldn’t possibly have been done the way the government told us.
The physics of the incident (see links above) and moral repugnance of the suggestion that the American government would deliberately slaughter thousands of its own citizens as a pretext for war are generally enough to dissuade thinking Americans from these sorts of theories.
Beyond those facts, the whole common sense element should belie any such claim about Building Seven. Allahpundit explains:
Why, oh why, oh why would the nefarious neocon junta that’s supposedly responsible for the 9/11 attacks have bothered with Building 7 in the first place? Never mind the huge number of government operatives they would have needed to plant explosives in the various buildings damaged or destroyed that day, or the fact that somehow not a single one of them has leaked anything about the plot more than nine years later despite that information being worth untold millions. Just ask yourself: If they were going to bring down the Towers as a pretext for war in the Middle East, why the hell would they have brought down Building 7 too? The structure’s collapse adds nothing to the already severe trauma of the day, and taking the time and effort to plant explosives would only increase the odds of detection. It would have been a wholly needless risk. And if, for whatever insane reason, the goal was to take down the Towers plus some other random building, why was Building Seven chosen instead of the far more iconic World Financial Center right next door?
Just so Fox is clear about the people whom they’ve given soapboxes, Geraldo and the Judge are apparently unconvinced by physics, common sense, and the simple human decency of their elected officials.
Let’s hope they don’t actually believe this tripe.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.