False, I quoted it, or you, correctly, in italics and then commented on it, sans italics, with my perception of the weak link in his, or your, line of argment. You must believe in a 1500 (or perhaps 2000) conspiracy theory against the holy catholic apostolic church, that they destroyed your true history, at the same time you believe they preserved and delivered the holy scriptures to you without corruption, which is cognitive dissonance.
From my post 35, bolded for emphasis in case your eyes are weak.
Therefore, the church fathers are actually the fathers of the Roman Catholic Church. They are the men who laid the foundation of apostasy that produced Romanism and Greek Orthodoxy.
And thus your witness confirms, unwittingly, the holy catholic apostolic church. The argument that said church engaged in a 1500 year conspiracy to destroy true history but shepherded and transmitted the holy scriptures is cognitive dissonance and thereby rejected.
Oh, my eyes arent weak at all
But, the false argument that these men are the FATHERS of the Church, that is what is weak
These men are fathers of apostasy, of error
Jesus ALONE is the foundation of the Church