[Syncro]

Perhaps you didn't understand my post to you. I was responding to this:

“You do know that accusing a poster of malice, libel or slander...actionable legal terms...can get you banned?”

Funny...didn't stop you from just doing it.

You are accusing me of accusing someone, on this forum, of "malice, libel or slander."

I asked you for proof I did that. Provide a link to THAT or retract your statement.

Looks like you are playing the "Nazi" card instead.

[Syncro]

I'm still waiting.

I tried to post to your last post to me to warn you about the first rule of holes, but I could not post to a removed post.

Looks like you want to learn the rule the hard way, you seem to be at the bottom of the hole digging furiously as the dirt is being shoveled back on you faster then you can throw it to the surface.

Just in case you forgot, here's the issue to gain a bit of credibility:

Perhaps you didn't understand my post to you. I was responding to this:

“You do know that accusing a poster of malice, libel or slander...actionable legal terms...can get you banned?”

Funny...didn't stop you from just doing it.

You are accusing me of accusing someone, on this forum, of "malice, libel or slander."

I asked you for proof I did that. Provide a link to THAT or retract your statement.

Looks like you are playing the "Nazi" card instead.

Answer quickly, because if I "read" the RF rules correctly, more posts may disappear...

[Elsie]

Looks like you are playing the "Nazi" card instead.

I'm sure that I did first.

If not first; then at least the most effective.