[.45 Long Colt]

“The nutty stuff we see these days makes the Genesis flood about corrupted genetics and not human sin.”

I was shocked when I realized people believe that. There seem to be a number of people teaching it and talking about it. Many of them probably couldn’t explain substitutionary atonement or imputation, but they’ve got the Sons of God and the rapture down.

[Lee N. Field]

There was a thread a while back on Freerepublic, where one of the participants was a parole officer out west somewhere. He said these beliefs were similar to beliefs he found among some of the neo-nazi types he'd had to deal with.

(I can't point you to that because things went south and the whole thread got deleted. I just thought that was a very interesting observation.)

[Lee N. Field]

Many of them probably couldn’t explain substitutionary atonement or imputation, but they’ve got the Sons of God and the rapture down.

They talk big.

so I ignored all of the more outrageous Nephilim and Book of Enoch stuff until I stumbled into a series done by a reformed pastor (Presby P.C.A.). It was a three-part series in which he rather reluctantly concluded the Scriptures favored the fallen angel view of Genesis 6, not the Sethite view common in reformed circles.

I wouldn't have much problem with the fallen angel view, if it weren't for what the whackos "itching ears" crowd does with it.