Many of them probably couldn’t explain substitutionary atonement or imputation, but they’ve got the Sons of God and the rapture down.
They talk big.
so I ignored all of the more outrageous Nephilim and Book of Enoch stuff until I stumbled into a series done by a reformed pastor (Presby P.C.A.). It was a three-part series in which he rather reluctantly concluded the Scriptures favored the fallen angel view of Genesis 6, not the Sethite view common in reformed circles.
I wouldn't have much problem with the fallen angel view, if it weren't for what the whackos "itching ears" crowd does with it.
I wouldn’t have much problem with the fallen angel view, if it weren’t for what the whackos “itching ears” crowd does with it.
Agreed