Replies

And, yes, AMg is correct. It is an anti catholic site. I’m on record as having stated so

Debate? Not with people who deal in feelings and old false teachings and refuse to reference the facts

And, yes, AMg is correct. It is an anti catholic site. I’m on record as having stated so

Note that catholic is almost always the 3rd or 4th most popular keyword, and it is not because of articles as these, but the incessant posting by RC devotees. If they want to do that, then do not complain when her elitists presumptions are challenged.

Some beliefs are not allowed here, e.g. Satanism. Any pro-Satanism posts would be removed and posters banned for posting them.

If this were an anti-Catholic site, then pro-Catholicism posts would be removed and posters banned for posting them. Obviously, Catholic posts are not removed and Catholics are not banned for posting them.

It is also not an anti-Protestantism site so pro-Protestantism posts are not removed and posters are not banned for posting them.

That said, this thread is posted in the Religion Forum. It is an "open" RF thread meaning posters may argue for or against deities, beliefs, religious authorities, etc. If that style of debate offends you, then IGNORE open RF threads altogether and instead post to RF threads labeled "caucus" "ecumenical" "prayer" or "devotional."

If you do not wish to see RF posts at all, then do NOT use the "everything" option on the Free Republic browse option list. Instead, browse by "News/Activism." When you log back in, the browse will reset to "everything" - so be sure to set it back to "News/Activism."

Not with people who deal in feelings and old false teachings and refuse to reference the facts

I'll indulge you your right to make unsourced claims.

It seems to soothe a spirit of victimhood in those obsessed with it.