Posted on 02/24/2015 8:03:21 AM PST by Steelfish
Hindus Ask Pope Francis To Punish Priest Who Said Yoga Leads To Satanism, 'Kingdom Of Darkness' By Bruce Wright @bctw on February 23 2015 The pope has been asked by some Hindus to discipline a Catholic priest who equated yoga and the devil. Reuters/Max Rossi
A group of Hindus is appealing to Pope Francis to intervene after a Catholic priest from Northern Ireland insinuated that the ancient discipline of yoga is tantamount to Satanism and paganism. Rev. Roland Colhoun from Glendermott parish was delivering a sermon in the village of Drumsurn on Feb. 8 dealing with the devil and exorcism when he said that both practicing yoga and getting Indian head massages will lead to the Kingdom of Darkness, according to the Belfast Telegraph.
The Hindu community on Sunday reacted with anger to Colhouns remarks, with Rajan Zed, president of the Universal Society of Hinduism, asking His Holiness Pope Francis to discipline a Derry Catholic priest who linked yoga to Satan. Zed, who has been a major proponent for incorporating yoga into everyday life for people across the world -- especially students -- said that yoga-related books could be found in the Vatican library.
(Excerpt) Read more at ibtimes.com ...
"The word "obelisk" literally means Baals Shaft or Baals organ of reproduction. This should be especially shocking when we realize that we have a gigantic obelisk in our nations capital known as the Washington Monument." [Dr. Cathy Burns - Masonic and Occult Symbols Illustrated pg 341]
And yes, Bel is Baal. Baal was the sun God. It's traces all the way back to Babylon as I showed in the verses from scripture.
Thank you. I don't find that at all credible; the "Lodge" has its own version of history that just doesn't line up with reality very well.
Credible sources suggest a reference to a spit, as for roasting:
Anybody who thinks that a tapered pillar with a square cross section and a pyramidal cap looks like a penis has problems. Serious problems. Such people should seek help.
LOL Anyone searching for the truth of the history of the obelisk can find it leads back to the sun worship and Baal.
That's not correct, either. There were actually several "Baals", none of which were "sun gods". I know that reference is only wikipedia, but it should provide a good start toward actually learning something.
Anyone searching for the truth of the history
LOL. That technique is called Poisoning the Well. It is a logical fallacy. Just so you know.
Mentioning what God had written in scripture is not “poisoning the well”. The Israelites were punished many times for messing around with different Baals.
You got that right, at least. Not much else, though. "Ra" was the Egyptian "sun god", the "Baal" of the Canaanites was NOT a "sun god", the attempt to connect "Dagon" (also not a "sun god") with the Roman Catholics is fabricated bogus history at its worst.
And "Beelzebub" wasn't a "sun god" either.
This whole line of argumentation you're presenting is risible and at variance with facts.
Hiding one’s argument behind the claim that “Anyone searching for the truth of the history” will agree with it, is precisely Poisoning the Well.
Now why would you try to twist my words" Here's my quote
"Anyone searching for the truth of the history of the obelisk can find it leads back to the sun worship and Baal."
Did I say they would agree with it?
The priest is right
You wrote "The word o-'bel'-isk actually means the 'shaft of Bel" in #31. Are those not your own words? Do you disagree with them?
Actually yes the Canaanite's many gods included Shapash who was the sun goddess.
>>the attempt to connect "Dagon" (also not a "sun god")<<
I didn't say Dagon was a sun god.
>>with the Roman Catholics is fabricated bogus history at its worst.<<
Go look up what hats the priests to the fish god Dagon wore. Nice double pointed open fish mouth hats just like the Catholic priests wear.
History is what it is. God didn’t like any association with objects of worship to any other god and made that very clear in scripture.
Is it wrong to do the exercising without the chanting? I am a Christian, but dont see how exercise would be sinful on its own.We were told by one of the holiests priests around that the exercises alone are fine; it's the religion behind them that needs to be avoided.
Never judge the sinner, only the sin.
You know what the Skull and Bones symbol was for ?
And it isn't what it isn't ... and what you're portraying as "history" is very much at variance to reality. It's wrong ... erroneous ... false ... counterfactual.
As if I haven't already examined this piece of bunk?
BTW, the word "obelisk" STILL has no real connection to the word "Bel" or "Baal". You're promoting as history that which is nonsense.
Family fortunes running opium - they were pirates.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.