To: Bigg Red; Arthur McGowan
Unfortunately this "insight" does not hold up well under serious scrutiny. It is, to put it mildly, a highly controversial theologoumenon that does not, and has never enjoyed widespread support within the Roman Church. See...
http://east2west.org/mandatory_clerical_celibacy.htm
25 posted on
02/19/2015 5:07:40 PM PST by
NRx
To: NRx; Arthur McGowan
I’d like to see Church support for unmarried clergy as doctrinal and not disciplinary.
27 posted on
02/19/2015 5:16:20 PM PST by
piusv
To: NRx
Well, whatever “support” it has or doesn’t have among whoever, it has support in the Code of Canon Law.
ALL clerics (deacons, priests, bishops), married or unmarried, are bound to perfect, perpetual continence. (There are many married deacons, some married priests, and no married bishops.)
To: NRx
37 posted on
02/20/2015 4:24:08 AM PST by
Bigg Red
(Let's put the ship of state on Cruz Control with Ted Cruz.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson