Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Bigg Red; Arthur McGowan
Unfortunately this "insight" does not hold up well under serious scrutiny. It is, to put it mildly, a highly controversial theologoumenon that does not, and has never enjoyed widespread support within the Roman Church. See...

http://east2west.org/mandatory_clerical_celibacy.htm
25 posted on 02/19/2015 5:07:40 PM PST by NRx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: NRx; Arthur McGowan

I’d like to see Church support for unmarried clergy as doctrinal and not disciplinary.


27 posted on 02/19/2015 5:16:20 PM PST by piusv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: NRx

Well, whatever “support” it has or doesn’t have among whoever, it has support in the Code of Canon Law.

ALL clerics (deacons, priests, bishops), married or unmarried, are bound to perfect, perpetual continence. (There are many married deacons, some married priests, and no married bishops.)


33 posted on 02/19/2015 10:39:13 PM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: NRx

w/e, n00b....


37 posted on 02/20/2015 4:24:08 AM PST by Bigg Red (Let's put the ship of state on Cruz Control with Ted Cruz.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson