[metmom]

RnMom:-— Could you lead us to the infallible Magisterium’s commentary on the whole bible-— No.

STA:Does the Bible require this?

Does the Catholic Church claim this?

Did I?

Well, then, since the RCC has not put out an infallible commentary on its infallible interpretation of Scripture, then neither it nor any Catholic is in any position to criticize or condemn anyone for making their own.

If they're left people high and dry for an infallible interpretation, then people most certainly have the option to interpret it as they see fit and the RCC can't say its wrong because they have nothing that they claim is right (correct) to which to compare it.

[RnMomof7]

Bingo!!!

[ealgeone]

And sadly, some of the dogmatic stuff the rcc has put out has been so wrong I'm not sure I want them to put out any "infallible" commentaries.

If they can't get Luke 1:28 and the concept of all have sinned right I'd hate to see the rest of their attempt at a commentary.

[Gamecock]

***Well, then, since the RCC has not put out an infallible commentary on its infallible interpretation of Scripture, then neither it nor any Catholic is in any position to criticize or condemn anyone for making their own.***

One would be forced to the conclusion that since Rome hasn’t put out an infallible commentary it is fair game. After all, there is no teaching magisterium that was passed down from the first Pope, right?

[Mark17]

Well, then, since the RCC has not put out an infallible commentary on its infallible interpretation of Scripture, then neither it nor any Catholic is in any position to criticize or condemn anyone for making their own.

Gee whiz MM, if there is no infallible commentary, the next thing you know, someone might say, that he is not really intrerpreting scripture, he is simply reading it and telling me what it says. Can you see that happening?😄😃😇