Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sola Scriptura
The John Ankerberg Show ^ | Feb.11,2015 | James McCarthy;

Posted on 02/11/2015 12:02:36 PM PST by RnMomof7

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 781-782 next last
To: stonehouse01; RnMomof7
Do over.

Speaking of the Jews.

Romans 3:2 Much in every way! First of all, the Jews have been entrusted with the very words of God.

NOT to the Catholics. Now, please show where the Jews ever considered the apocryphal books scripture.

Hint: The apocryphal books were never acknowledged as sacred scriptures by the Jews.

121 posted on 02/11/2015 4:43:40 PM PST by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

I just liked the graphic.


122 posted on 02/11/2015 4:45:09 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
placemarker

hi! Salvation

123 posted on 02/11/2015 4:47:39 PM PST by aMorePerfectUnion ( "Forward lies the crown, and onward is the goal.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: GBA

Not so fascinating. Nothing in what he wrote showed that the Jews considered the apocrypha scripture.


124 posted on 02/11/2015 4:47:39 PM PST by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7; paladinan; metmom
**Where does Rome get its authority from?** Rome.


125 posted on 02/11/2015 4:47:57 PM PST by Gamecock (Joel Osteen is a minister of the Gospel like Captain Crunch is a Naval line officer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

[that was supposed to come out as small type, but came out as a strikethrough. sorry]


126 posted on 02/11/2015 4:48:15 PM PST by aMorePerfectUnion ( "Forward lies the crown, and onward is the goal.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

Note ((((crickets)))


127 posted on 02/11/2015 4:49:01 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: ravenwolf; RnMomof7
>Jesus first named Peter (Cephas) in John 1:42.<<

The Holy Spirit inspired the New Testament to be written in Greek which has distinctly different words Petros and Petra which have distinctly different meanings. I don't think we should question what the Holy Spirit had written.

128 posted on 02/11/2015 4:50:07 PM PST by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: bike800
>>So who decided what books were...and what books were not...to be included in the bible?<<

God used Judas, Balaam's donkey, and Pilot to advance His plan. Should we continue?

129 posted on 02/11/2015 4:53:35 PM PST by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

Isata gotcha???


130 posted on 02/11/2015 4:54:57 PM PST by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: metmom
Well, then, since the RCC has not put out an infallible commentary on its infallible interpretation of Scripture, then neither it nor any Catholic is in any position to criticize or condemn anyone for making their own.

Gee whiz MM, if there is no infallible commentary, the next thing you know, someone might say, that he is not really intrerpreting scripture, he is simply reading it and telling me what it says. Can you see that happening?😄😃😇

131 posted on 02/11/2015 4:55:34 PM PST by Mark17 (Calvary's love has never faltered, all it's wonder still remains. Souls still take eternal passage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

132 posted on 02/11/2015 4:58:31 PM PST by Gamecock (Joel Osteen is a minister of the Gospel like Captain Crunch is a Naval line officer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: St_Thomas_Aquinas
Jesus commands us to “listen to the church,”...

That error has been addressed several times already.

If Jesus gave the command somewhere to *Listen to the church*, please provide the chapter and verse for it.

...and that those who “will not listen to the church, treat him as a pagan or tax collector.”

And again, that is in regard to dealing with disputes between individual believers where the issue has not been resolved at the levels before it.

Here is the passage in context.

This passage is not a blanket order to obey the leadership of any church which claims that it alone is the one true church.

It is at the end of a discourse addressing how to handle disputes in the body.

It lays out very specifically the steps one is to go through in resolving personal conflict within the body.

Matthew 18:15-20 “If your brother sins against you, go and tell him his fault, between you and him alone. If he listens to you, you have gained your brother. But if he does not listen, take one or two others along with you, that every charge may be established by the evidence of two or three witnesses. If he refuses to listen to them, tell it to the church.

And if he refuses to listen even to the church, let him be to you as a Gentile and a tax collector. Truly, I say to you, whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven. Again I say to you, if two of you agree on earth about anything they ask, it will be done for them by my Father in heaven. For where two or three are gathered in my name, there am I among them.”

NOWHERE does Jesus command us to "listen to the church".

The comment is *IF he does not listen to the church, then......*

That is a gross misinterpretation of the passage to claim or imply that it is a standing order of Jesus to listen to the Catholic church.

The clear meaning is here for everyone to see. It's dealing with disputes among believers, not absolute authority given to *the Church*.

133 posted on 02/11/2015 5:00:38 PM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: St_Thomas_Aquinas
Therefore, no reference to Scripture in the Bible can prove the sufficiency of the Bible, because “Scripture,” in the Bible, refers to either the Torah, the Old Testament, or the Book of Revelation.

Is that your own personal interpretation of Scripture?

Do you not believe that the Bible is Scripture?

On what authority do you get to determine and decide what is Scripture and what is not?

Are you saying then that the RCC puts stuff in the Bible that is NOT Scripture?

Non-Catholic answer: The Bible is sufficient because it IS Scripture and Scripture is sufficient.

134 posted on 02/11/2015 5:06:12 PM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: ravenwolf
On the rock issue, most of what I read agree that stone or rock would be derived from the Aramaic word of Cephas.

No argument about the name of Peter can be made on manuscripts that do not exist (Aramaic) because if they did they would have said it this way........

That is beyond ludicrous as a way to defend a position.

The Holy Spirit inspired the NT in Greek. Whatever anyone may think the words might have been had they been in another language is irrelevant.

Satan is still saying..... *Did God really say....?*

135 posted on 02/11/2015 5:09:20 PM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: metmom; St_Thomas_Aquinas
" On what authority do you get to determine and decide what is Scripture and what is not?

"Are you saying then that the RCC puts stuff in the Bible that is NOT Scripture?

Wow! Ol' Tom and Martin Luther, stripping stuff out of the Bible! Imagine the irony...

136 posted on 02/11/2015 5:10:55 PM PST by aMorePerfectUnion ( "Forward lies the crown, and onward is the goal.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear

I don’t think we should question what the Holy Spirit had written.


I don`t know any thing about it first hand but most seem to believe Jesus spoke in Aramic, and I do not question what the holy spirit says but I some times question what some one may say the holy spirit says.

I also don`t question what Jesus said.


137 posted on 02/11/2015 5:11:17 PM PST by ravenwolf (s letters scripture.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

FOTFLOL!!!!!


138 posted on 02/11/2015 5:11:46 PM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear
I don't think we should question what the Holy Spirit had written.

Yeah, but the enemy is still getting lots of mileage out of *Did God really say....?*

Why should he give it up?

139 posted on 02/11/2015 5:13:49 PM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Mark17
I never would have thought I'd see that.

(but I did....)

140 posted on 02/11/2015 5:14:47 PM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 781-782 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson