Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: RnMomof7

“Many Catholic apologists have honed to near perfection the technique of blasting to smithereens the anti-creedal, anti-historical, anti-intellectual positions of “Bible-Only” fundamentalists.”

That’s quite claim. I’d like to see that, because I’ve seen nothing but sophism from the Protestant side trying to defend their own creeds.


4 posted on 02/09/2015 12:54:28 PM PST by mikeus_maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mikeus_maximus

First they divided the Christian faith, now they want to divide FReepers. Is this weird or what?


5 posted on 02/09/2015 1:03:21 PM PST by elhombrelibre (Against Obama. Against Putin. Pro-freedom. Pro-US Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: mikeus_maximus
I’d like to see that, because I’ve seen nothing but sophism from the Protestant side trying to defend their own creeds.

Uh, there's also the Short Catechism, which does not come across to me as Sophist; if you go more deeply into Luther's Catechism, he buttresses every statement of his by Scripture, showing that the Creed is a statement based on Scripture.

8 posted on 02/09/2015 1:14:10 PM PST by chajin ("There is no other name under heaven given among people by which we must be saved." Acts 4:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: mikeus_maximus
Your own reply ...

“Many Catholic apologists have honed to near perfection the technique of blasting to smithereens the anti-creedal, anti-historical, anti-intellectual positions of “Bible-Only” fundamentalists.”
" That’s quite claim. I’d like to see that, because I’ve seen nothing but sophism from the Protestant side trying to defend their own creeds."

And in my opinion, your first reply is as sophist as you claim Protestants are

I'm non Catholic .. I protest nothing

Catholics need to refrain from using "Protestant" as a descripture and separate the Catholic from the non-Catholic.

I think the debate would be more intellectual and mature

10 posted on 02/09/2015 1:40:03 PM PST by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but, they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: mikeus_maximus
That’s quite claim. I’d like to see that, because I’ve seen nothing but sophism from the Protestant side trying to defend their own creeds.

 
 
 
Bernadine: …all gifts, all virtues, and all graces are dispensed by the hands of Mary to whomsoever, when, and as she pleases. O Lady, since thou art the dispenser of all graces, and since the grace of salvation can ONLY come through thy hands, OUR SALVATION DEPENDS ON THEE.

Bonaventure: …the gates of heaven will open to all who confide in the protection of Mary. Blessed are they who know thee, O Mother of God, for the knowledge of THEE is the high road to everlasting life, and the publication of thy virtues is the way of ETERNAL SALVATION . Give ear, O ye nations; and all you who desire heaven , serve, honor Mary, and certainly you will find ETERNAL LIFE.

Ephem: …devotion to the divine Mother…is the unlocking of the heavenly Jerusalem.

Blosius: To the, O Lady, are committed the KEYS and the treasures of the kingdom of Heaven.

Ambrose: …constantly pray ‘Open to us, O Mary, the gates of paradise, since thou hast its KEYS.

Fulgetius: …by Mary God descended from Heaven into the world, that by HER man might ascend from earth to Heaven.

Athanasius: …And, thou, O Lady, wast filled with grace, that thou mightiest be the way of our SALVATION and the means of ascent to the heavenly Kingdom.

Richard of Laurence: Mary, in fine, is the mistress of heaven; for there she commands as she wills, and ADMITS whom she wills.

Guerric: …he who serves Mary and for whom she intercedes, is as CERTAIN of heaven as if he were already there…and those who DO NOT serve Mary will NOT BE SAVED.

Anselm: It suffices, O Lady, that thou willest it, and our SALVATION is certain.

Antoninus: …souls protected by Mary, and on which she casts her eyes, are NECESSARILY JUSTIFIED AND SAVED.

27 posted on 02/09/2015 2:51:17 PM PST by Elsie ( Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: mikeus_maximus; metmom; boatbums; caww; presently no screen name; redleghunter; ...
That’s quite claim. I’d like to see that, because I’ve seen nothing but sophism from the Protestant side trying to defend their own creeds.

Really? That explains why i have never seen you post in all my years posting on the FR, which by God's grace has been extensive. And in which is RC sophistry that has been often exposed.

Including their fundamental premise than an infallible magisterium is essential to correctly know what the Bible consists of, and its meaning, and that being the historical instruments and stewards of that means Rome possess perpetual magisterial infallibility. Which is what is behind the recourse to the "we gave you the Bible" polemical assertion.

Care to defend that, and multitude others things not seen in the NT church?

80 posted on 02/09/2015 5:04:20 PM PST by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson