To: metmom
Why did you exclude verses 7 - 11, which describe Peter rising and making his point (with which James then concurred)?
To: BlatherNaut
Why did you exclude verses 7 - 11, which describe Peter rising and making his point (with which James then concurred)?James did not concurr, you are making that up...Peter spoke first...Paul spoke second and James layed it out on the line...There's no question that James was the decision maker...
176 posted on
02/08/2015 2:02:42 PM PST by
Iscool
To: BlatherNaut
Why did you exclude verses 7 - 11, which describe Peter rising and making his point Because you already did and it would have been redundant.
Why didn't YOU post the whole passage where JAMES stands up and speaks his piece and where the church makes the decision unanimously?
184 posted on
02/08/2015 2:15:04 PM PST by
metmom
(...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
To: BlatherNaut; metmom
>>(with which James then concurred)<<
Say what? In what alternate world does "I judge not to trouble" mean "James then concurred"?
190 posted on
02/08/2015 2:27:45 PM PST by
CynicalBear
(For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson