Why Catholicism Is Preferable to Protestantism

catholic.com ^ | April 10, 2014 | | Devin Rose

[verga]

Romans 3:23 for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God,

Dictionary.com: all

adjective

1. the whole of (used in referring to quantity, extent, or duration): "all the cake; all the way; all year."

2. the whole number of (used in referring to individuals or particulars, taken collectively): "all students."

3. the greatest possible (used in referring to quality or degree): "with all due respect; with all speed."

4. every:

The prot position now is that All doesn't mean all and can no longer be trusted. Is that what you are saying?

[verga]

Two sets of Rules on FR.

[BlueDragon]

In fact, isn’t your erroneous assumption that I have been here before under another name “making it personal?”

It was asking a personal question.

When (or if) you were to point out those sort of things when others do so (like "getting personal" but beyond mere questioning) such as those whom more closely share your own religious convictions (even yourself?), then I might take what you say more serious.

Until then, it comes across to me as effort to bind one group -- while protecting yet another from all criticism.

I tend to take the long view, in these things. ;^')

[BlueDragon]

You, my FRiend have absolutely no room to talk about "two sets of rules".

[Grateful2God]

OK, I didn't see it, and I apologize!

Didn't you see the smiley at the end of the note? Sorry for the misunderstanding!

[verga]

Why not?

[Grateful2God]

You're entitled to your opinion. If you feel things are one-sided, then speak to the Moderator.

God bless you!

[Grateful2God]

Thank you; I appreciate that!

God bless you!

[Grateful2God]

Thank you! That was a beautiful prayer: where did you find it?

God bless you!

[daniel1212]

OK, I didn't see it, and I apologize! Didn't you see the smiley at the end of the note? Sorry for the misunderstanding!

Sorry also.

[Grateful2God]

No sweat! : )

God bless you!

[Salvation]

I clicked on one of your links and it went to your blog......is there some reason you do not source these?

[BlueDragon]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/3252810/posts?page=267#267

[BlueDragon]

"If you feel things are one-sided, then speak to the Moderator."{

Huh?

You posted that to the WRONG guy!

[GeronL]

I can’t believe people would bother reading absolute filth and degeneracy as this garbage.

[GeronL]

Christians don’t, only Catholics do. :p

[Elsie]

Two sets of Rules on FR.

Would you post them?

Or just some examples of them?

[Elsie]

Google® is our friend.

(Most of the time)

[Elsie]

May we be made worthy of the promises of Christ through your prayers.

HERESY!!!

[BlueDragon]

I clicked on one of your links and it went to your blog......is there some reason you do not source these?

As far as I can tell
What is there which is attributed to others, is sourced, including links to scripture.

Some of the links lead to other portions within his own work to more extensive commentary as for some particular point of discussion. When there are quotations from others in those places of deeper discussion, I do not know if there are many (or even one?) which does not provide source information.

Is there something more specific which one should be able to demand "source" for?