Luther said James was not of apostolic authorship.
Go ahead and explain that away. Can you?
Go ahead and try to explain "away" your own initial error (which I did address) .
And then, I'll possibly ignore it, for truths of that matter which you did not properly assess cannot be undone now, hundreds of years later.
Did you know that a reigning bishop of Rome put his own seals of approval on the Complutensian Polyglot?
Nothing hinders
Let it be printed
Just following the church fathers again:
Of the disputed books, which are nevertheless familiar to the majority, there are extant the Epistle of James, as it is called; and that of Jude; and the second Epistle of Peter; and those that are called the Second and Third of John, ....