.
I believe what Paul wrote.
The oracles of God were committed to Israel.
The destruction of the gospel of the kingdom was clearly committed to Constantine, and he took his commission from Satan seriously. He also failed to obliterate the gospel of Matthew; it survived his mission.
The traces of his crimes also survived in the Greek versions of the gospels and epistles, in the form of clumsy cultural and translational errors that are scattered throughout them, to be found by those reading for understanding rather than to support churchianity.
.
“The oracles of God were committed to Israel.”
Yet Luke was not Jewish. There’s no mandate to write in Hebrew. If that were the case, then no Aramaic would have been used let alone Greek.
“The destruction of the gospel of the kingdom was clearly committed to Constantine, and he took his commission from Satan seriously. He also failed to obliterate the gospel of Matthew; it survived his mission.”
There was no “commission” to destroy the “gospel of the kingdom”. Seriously, now you’re just straying into twilight-world conspiracy nonsense.
“The traces of his crimes also survived in the Greek versions of the gospels and epistles, in the form of clumsy cultural and translational errors that are scattered throughout them, to be found by those reading for understanding rather than to support churchianity.”
No. Since the NT Greek mss are the only ones we have that date back to earliest times there is nothing to compare them to to conclude there were “clumsy cultural and translational errors that are scattered throughout them”. And the LXX was written more than 400 years before Constantine.