“When the big red flag should have been for the bishop that a woman claimed a virgin birth and the child was claimed to be Christ born a second time?”
And Judas traveled with the Apostles for three years and none of them knew he was a ‘devil’.
“And today in the 21st century a Catholic mystic site keeps her testimony next to others they uphold?”
Did you see why they do it?
“They also make the claim they are faithful to Catholic teachings?”
Again, did you see why they do it? You didn’t read it did you? Then you missed the whole point. Here it is:
“For sure another one of the spiritual lessons is that all that glitters is not necessarily gold, and the devil does not counterfeit tin or copper, or even silver-—he seeks to counterfeit gold. So we need to be very careful, with the help of God, not to be misled by his phony deceptions.”
I did read the entire piece. The point is one can address error without waiting to the final few paragraphs.
The message is no doubt that she gave a bad name to mystics having the same or similar experiences.