“What part of Sola Scriptura do you not understand.”
How anyone can believe in it when it doesn’t appear in scripture and is therefore self-refuting.
“Matthew is part of scripture.”
Show me the verse that specifically says Matthew’s gospel is inspired. And, no, 2 Timothy 3:16 never says it.
“Sola Scriptura means that Matthew being scripture can be used as one of the sources to check if a belief is correct.”
Show me the verse that specifically says Matthew’s gospel is inspired. And, no, 2 Timothy 3:16 never says it.
“Now, in my example of Tobit. That Catholic Church says that is scripture right? So do you believe that burning the heart of a fish and walking through the smoke will drive away demons?”
(sigh) Honestly, Protestant anti-Catholics amaze me with their complete predictability: http://www.oodegr.co/english/ag_grafi/pd/TOBIT/part1.htm
If you ever read John 9:6 ask yourself if Jesus was being superstitious.
Jesus was performing that miracle. Burning fish hearts with no mention of doing it in Jesus name is witchcraft.
Define sola scriptura.. and please tell me what the gospel was that Jesus preached
LOL
This is what happens when a scripture is out of context..
This was the Sabbath.. watching were the legalistic Pharisees...
Now this is where it gets interesting ...NO WORK was allowed on the Sabbath ..and the Jews forbid spitting into the dirt on Sundays because that made mortar
So Jesus was doing a WORK by spitting and then USING the mud ...
Jesus was defying A LAW OF MEN ..
Now Vladimir.. READ ON a little further
13 They brought to the Pharisees the man who had been blind. 14 Now the day on which Jesus had made the mud and opened the man’s eyes was a Sabbath. 15 Therefore the Pharisees also asked him how he had received his sight. “He put mud on my eyes,” the man replied, “and I washed, and now I see.” 16 Some of the Pharisees said, “This man is not from God, for he does not keep the Sabbath
Jesus was showing the uselessness of man made laws