1 posted on
01/23/2015 2:45:00 PM PST by
NYer
To: Tax-chick; GregB; SumProVita; narses; bboop; SevenofNine; Ronaldus Magnus; tiki; Salvation; ...
2 posted on
01/23/2015 2:45:29 PM PST by
NYer
(Without justice - what else is the State but a great band of robbers? - St. Augustine)
To: NYer
I’d suspect that this may have emotional ramifications...sociologically but isn’t likely to affect the SCOTUS decision..
3 posted on
01/23/2015 2:48:11 PM PST by
MeshugeMikey
("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
To: NYer
If Francis had never uttered the words “Who am I to judge”, the liberal love affair with the Pope would not exist. He’s the one that stepped right into it, knowing full well he will uphold the teachings of the Catholic Church. Either that or become an apostate.
4 posted on
01/23/2015 2:55:55 PM PST by
NKP_Vet
To: NYer
Francis the hypocrite. One minuet he wants to compromise on
gay marriage and gay priests in the church and now when his feet
are to the fire we get this.
Francis = Obama = communism.
5 posted on
01/23/2015 3:00:04 PM PST by
Slambat
To: NYer
I don't know why anyone would be shocked if you actually took *everything* he's been saying in context instead of pulling random quotes and translating on the fly and putting whatever double meaning on the
English words . . .
He has been clear all along on the subject of marriage. And I agree with his opinion on gays insofar as we shouldn't be stoning them. And, literally, we are not stoning them. The opposite of stoning them, is "not stoning them". The opposite of stoning them is NOT "legalize same-sex marriage".
9 posted on
01/23/2015 3:06:22 PM PST by
Tanniker Smith
(Rome didn't fall in a day, either.)
To: Gamecock; metmom; daniel1212; BlueDragon; Mark17
In his trip to the Philippines, Pope Francis once again defended marriage, and he again edged closer to a firm, unequivocal papal statement against same-sex “marriage.” How do we know he's not being mistranslated?
10 posted on
01/23/2015 3:07:48 PM PST by
Alex Murphy
("the defacto Leader of the FR Calvinist Protestant Brigades")
To: NYer
Everything to everyone? ??
12 posted on
01/23/2015 3:23:46 PM PST by
dasboot
To: NYer
Thank you. I enjoy reading Paul Kengor’s articles, whether political or religious.
14 posted on
01/23/2015 3:29:39 PM PST by
GreyFriar
(Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
To: NYer
Liberals discover that Pope Francis really wasn’t talking about anything more general than his work relationship with the curia when he said that. Hilarity ensues. Well, for us, anyway. For the liberals, not so much.
22 posted on
01/23/2015 3:52:54 PM PST by
RichInOC
("Alles, was man ueber Abtreibung wissen muss, steht im 5. Gebot."--Schoenborn)
To: NYer
*8Reporter Ben Smith at The Daily Signal wrote that “the pope reaffirmed his commitment to traditional marriage, speaking to the crowd about his concern for the ‘ideological colonization of the family,’ which many took as a swipe at gay marriage. The Vatican later confirmed that marriage was on the pope’s mind.” **
Marriage between one man and one woman until death parts them.
25 posted on
01/23/2015 5:53:37 PM PST by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
To: NYer
“Edged closer” why can’t he just say it and be done with it?
27 posted on
01/23/2015 9:42:07 PM PST by
kalee
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson