Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: icwhatudo
re: They did not refuse to hold the funeral because the woman was a sexual deviant, they refused because the family wanted to show a video containing homosexual kissing. These people define their existence by their sexual escapades.

Well put. It seems to me that heterosexuals tend to define their existence in much broader categories. Yes, their gender and their attraction for the opposite sex is a big part of their identity, but so is their occupation, their family roles and relationships, their religion, their ethnic background, their interests and hobbies, their nationality. But to most homosexuals, it is as if their homosexuality is the whole pie. And that whole pie must not only be accepted. It must be celebrated whether you agree with it or not.

12 posted on 01/13/2015 2:54:40 PM PST by Nevadan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Nevadan; icwhatudo

I disagree.

The church was at fault here. They should have said no from the get go. Their refusal to air the video now makes them look like hypocrites.

The church KNEW this was an unrepentant lezzie bfore the service. So they had every reason to believe the queer agenda would be promoted at the funeral.

And it was.

So why did the church object when it was too late?


14 posted on 01/13/2015 3:03:46 PM PST by Responsibility2nd (See Ya On The Road; Al Baby's Mom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson