Posted on 01/08/2015 6:02:09 PM PST by ebb tide
"Peace is all right," Salvini said. "But as spokesman of all Catholics, you should be concerned about those who are slaughtering you all over the world".
(Excerpt) Read more at ansa.it ...
Fine...good ideas...who will be the first to even attempt it????? Sure won’t be our politicians nor any of any other nations peoples...it simply isn;t one of the cards they intend to play...at all.
Damn....hit a nerve there, didn't I?
For the record, I wasn't commenting on your grammar, but the silly usage of the word, 'dialogue', in the title.
Secondly, you've been here long enough to know that any thread you post is fair game for any comment Freepers care to make, including comments which aren't "germane" to the topic at hand.
Don't like it? Complain to the management.
I'm not Catholic and not "covering" for the Pope's behavior. My point is that there is nothing wrong with talking to Islamic leaders. The odds are pretty good that there is something wrong with what this pope would say in that situation, but I would expect a true Christian to bring God's word even to the leaders of terrorists. A great Pope might even convert some terrorists and help them find their way to God.
Get educated and look up “dialogue” in a dictionary.
You may be embarrassed.
What you might see as a Christian, and his or her mission and when and to whom may very well not be what God sees and determines.
History is clear when an enemy declares war on you you don't kiss his butt while he kills your people.
THE MYTH OF THE RELIGION OF PEACE...
What Did the Saints Say about Islam?
Spirit Daily ^ | August 12, 2014 | By Andrew Bieszad on
JUAN de RIVERA
St. Juan de Ribera, Viceroy and Bishop of Valencia (1568-1611), Supervising the Expulsion of Moriscos; Francisco Domingo Marques, 1912
For Islamic scholars, there is a statement in the apostolic exhortation of Pope Francis, Evangelii Gaudium, which is particularly troubling:
Faced with disconcerting episodes of violent fundamentalism, our respect for true followers of Islam should lead us to avoid hateful generalisations, for authentic Islam and the proper reading of the Koran are opposed to every form of violence. (p. 253)
As the situation in the Middle East escalates, and the violence of the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS) spills rivers of innocent Christian blood, this statement seems incongruous with reality.
Popes are certainly free to have personal opinions. A Popes opinions, however, when shared with the public, carry more weight because of the authority of his office than would the opinions of another, lesser prelate. His words particularly when expressed not through an interview or sermon, but an official document signal, at least implictly, that his opinion is in fact the belief of the Church. This has a real impact on the understanding of whatever issue is being touched upon, for both Catholics and non-Catholics alike. Particularly in a modern context, where global news is instantaneously available, papal opinions spread far, and fast. Once an idea is out in the wild as something the pope said, it becomes difficult to ever take back. There is even a not entirely uncommon misconception that papal opinion, when it touches on any subject related to faith, rises to the level of infallibility.
It seems that there has never been so much division within the Church over basic doctrine. Catholics today argue over long-established teachings which, as recently as fifty years ago, were accepted without dissent. This division appears to permeate the Church, and can be seen not only amongst the laity, but also within the ranks of Catholicisms highest prelates. This division relates not only to our own internal understanding of teaching about articles of faith and sacramental beliefs, but the way in which the Catholic Church should deal with other religions. It is particularly worrying that this comes at a time when Islam is rising in power, having recently exterminated the Catholic Faith from Iraq, with ever greater numbers of Muslims answering Islams call to jihad against Christians.
As I have taken note of the most recent round Catholic infighting over how to view the Muslim faith, I found myself revisiting a question I began pondering during my graduate studies of this growing religion: What do the saints have to say about Islam?
The following is a brief list of quotes from Catholic saints about Islam and its founder, Muhammad. This list is by no means exhaustive, but it is illustrative of how Catholics particularly those favored sons and daughters of the Church we now know to be in heaven viewed the Muslim faith in prior generations:
Whoever does not embrace the Catholic Christian faith is lost, like your false prophet Muhammad.
-St. Peter Mavimenus (d. 8th century), martyr from Gaza. Response reported in the Martyriologum Romanum when he was asked to convert to Islam by a group of Muslims.
There is also the superstition of the Ishmaelites which to this day prevails and keeps people in error, being a forerunner of the Antichrist . From that time to the present a false prophet named Mohammed has appeared in their midst. This man, after having chanced upon the Old and New Testaments and likewise, it seems, having conversed with an Arian monk, devised his own heresy. Then, having insinuated himself into the good graces of the people by a show of seeming piety, he gave out that a certain book had been sent down to him from heaven. He had set down some ridiculous compositions in this book of his and he gave it to them as an object of veneration.
-St. John Damascene (d. 749), Syrian Arab Catholic monk and scholar. Quoted from his book On Heresies under the section On the Heresy of the Ishmaelites (in The Fathers of the Church. Vol. 37. Translated by the Catholic University of America. CUA Press. 1958. Pages 153-160.)
We profess Christ to be truly God and your prophet to be a precursor of the Antichrist and other profane doctrine.
-Sts. Habenitus, Jeremiah, Peter, Sabinian, Walabonsus, and Wistremundus (d. 851), martyrs of Cordoba, Spain. Reported in the Memoriale Sanctorum in response to Spanish Umayyad Caliph Abd Ar-Rahman IIs ministers that they convert to Islam on pain of death.
Any cult which denies the divinity of Christ, does not profess the existence of the Holy Trinity, refutes baptism, defames Christians, and derogates the priesthood, we consider to be damned.
-Sts. Aurelius, Felix, George, Liliosa, and Natalia (d. 852), martyrs of Cordoba, Spain. Reported in the Memoriale Sanctorum in response to Spanish Umayyad Caliph Abd Ar-Rahman IIs ministers that they convert to Islam on pain of death.
On the other hand, those who founded sects committed to erroneous doctrines proceeded in a way that is opposite to this, the point is clear in the case of Muhammad. He seduced the people by promises of carnal pleasure to which the concupiscence of the flesh goads us. His teaching also contained precepts that were in conformity with his promises, and he gave free rein to carnal pleasure. In all this, as is not unexpected, he was obeyed by carnal men. As for proofs of the truth of his doctrine, he brought forward only such as could be grasped by the natural ability of anyone with a very modest wisdom. Indeed, the truths that he taught he mingled with many fables and with doctrines of the greatest falsity. He did not bring forth any signs produced in a supernatural way, which alone fittingly gives witness to divine inspiration; for a visible action that can be only divine reveals an invisibly inspired teacher of truth. On the contrary, Muhammad said that he was sent in the power of his armswhich are signs not lacking even to robbers and tyrants.
-St. Thomas Aquinas (d. 1274), Theologian and Doctor of the Church. Quoted from his De Rationibus Fidei Contra Saracenos, Graecos, et Armenos and translated from Fr. Damian Fehlners Aquinas on Reasons for the Faith: Against the Muslims, Greeks, and Armenians (Franciscans of the Immaculate. 2002.).
As we have seen, Muhammed had neither supernatural miracles nor natural motives of reason to persuade those of his sect. As he lacked in everything, he took to bestial and barbaric means, which is the force of arms. Thus he introduced and promulgated his message with robberies, murders, and bloodshedding, destroying those who did not want to receive it, and with the same means his ministers conserve this today, until God placates his anger and destroys this pestilence from the earth.
THE REST O0F THE ARTICLE
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/3247130/posts
It doesn’t take a list of authors nor all the debate about Islam to know that it’s a death cult and in opposition to the God of the Bible.
At greatest issue is that far too many care not who the God of the Bible is and less too of what HE says. This nation has turned it’s back on God...and as Biblical History shows us, when a nation turns against God it will always be “invaded”....that is where we are today.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.