LOL, I don’t think being widely known for something, or being famous for something, is based on whatever it is that you claim you know personally.
The Catholic leadership is widely known for it’s problems with male on male sex.
“LOL, I don’t think being widely known for something, or being famous for something, is based on whatever it is that you claim you know personally.”
I don’t think a person’s clear unfamiliarity with something makes his assertions about anything else any more reliable. Maybe you should read more.
“The Catholic leadership is widely known for it’s problems with male on male sex.”
Actually, no. The problem with the leadership has been its weakness in stopping homosexuality among the lower clergy. But no one expects someone who doesn’t know the obvious to be anymore knowledgeable about the real problems of the Catholic leadership than he isn’t about problems among Episcopal clergy. After all if someone can miss decades of news stories about ephebophilia among Episcopal clergy not much can be expected of him in a conversation on the same topic for something similar.