Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: arthurus
The so-caled “apocrypha” are the books in the older Septaguint compilation of the Bible which the Protestants are uncomfortable with so they decided to go with the more recent Masoretic collection which left out those books.

We figure that the JEWS ought to know their own scriptures a wee bit better than the claim that Rome does.

61 posted on 12/21/2014 11:39:42 AM PST by Elsie ( Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Elsie

Which sect of Jews? The Jews who became Christian were largely the Greek-Hellenistic Jews, first and foremost was Saint Paul himself. Those who had access to the Greek-LXX version of the OT were the Jews more likely to believe in Christ and enter the Church. The Jews in Palestine, the ones holding to the Hebrew only tradition that the Rabbinical tradition grew out of in the late 1st and 2nd century were the Jewish groups who were more opposed to Christianity.


66 posted on 12/21/2014 11:48:33 AM PST by CTrent1564
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

To: Elsie

The Jews compiled the Septaguint a long time before the Masoretic compilation, BC, in fact whereas the Masoretic was a couple of centuries AD and avoided old accepted books that they thought might justify some Christian ideas. Mainline Protestants do seem to be taken with what is newer and more fashionable.


67 posted on 12/21/2014 11:49:17 AM PST by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

To: Elsie
First of all, the Masoretic texts were copied, edited and distributed by the Masoretes between the 7th and 10th centuries AD.-- AD. They're not exactly the oldest sources, nor even based on the oldest sources!!

Second, you logically have find an authenticating authority on the texts (since the texts are not self- authenticating.) On the one hand, you have a group of Jews from a 7-10 century continuous tradition of rejecting Jesus as the Messiah, which I (as a Christian) would say is a 7 - 10 century tradition of misunderstanding their own Scriptures. (Sorry, That's how I see it.) They didn't just reject the 7 books of the Deutercanonicals. They rejected the whole 27 books of the New Testament.

On the other hand, you have a group of Christians with a 7-10 century continuous tradition of accepting Jesus as the Messiah. And you reject the Scripture specialists who say "Christ, Yes" and go with the ones who say "Christ, NO"?

????

Oy gevalt!

84 posted on 12/21/2014 3:01:06 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o ("In humility correct those who are in opposition, so that they may know the truth." 2 Tim 2:25)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson