All right, I'll see if I can make it plain. DON'T TWIST THE WORDS OF SCRIPTURE TO MAKE IT MEAN SOMETHING IT DOESN'T. And don't play the "did God really say" game with me. I showed you where the Catholic Church eliminated the word "and" from the verse trying to make it say something it didn't to bolster their position. Now, if you want to twist the words to your satisfaction feel free but expect to be shown the truth should you promote your error publicly.
Ok man, if you insist I’m “twisting” Scripture then I guess I must be. After all, you’re using bold lettering so that certainly is proof enough! < /SARC >
By the way, even if you’re right, you’ve only showed an error on Tim Staple’s part but Tim Staples isn’t a priest, much less the Pope. So at best, you still haven’t shown “the Catholic Church eliminated the word “and” from the verse trying to make it say something it didn’t “.
At best (for you) is you’ve shown Tim Staples made an error in his argument (not the Church) (an error by the way if [and that’s a big “if” in of itself] conceded still doesn’t destroy his central argument there)
And for the record also, I didn’t “eliminate the word ‘and’” at all in my point to you.
Go ahead and get that precious last word in; I’ll still be waiting if you want to answer my question reasonably.