Replies

To: BlueDragon; terycarl; EagleOne

I did not say “the Catholic Canon was established 2000 years ago”. I said that the books of the Bible that we have today did not change for 2000 years. The context was that the Catholic Church “added” to the Bible. It did not.

5,557 posted on 01/08/2015 9:04:00 PM PST by annalex (fear them not)

To: annalex; Elsie; terycarl; EagleOne

I did not say “the Catholic Canon was established 2000 years ago”

You said

"The Catholic Bible is the same today as it was two thousand years ago."

and I just proved that to be incorrect -- not true.

The context was that the Catholic Church “added” to the Bible. It did not.

When we retrace the exchange of comments back to #5389 where it started, Elsie said;

Now, how do you explain the ADDITIONS to 'scripture' that Rome teaches?

he was obviously enough (to my own eyes) not there speaking of 'Rome' as it were having added to 'scripture' itself, but was instead speaking about what 'Rome' teaches that is addition to scripture, as in "extra-biblical", not in the bible, etc.

Understand now?

So that make you wrong here in two ways at once! Imagine thAT.

5,558 posted on 01/08/2015 10:18:55 PM PST by BlueDragon (when puppies learn how to read and remember what the read -- THEN they can join in the discussions)

I said that the books of the Bible that we have today did not change for 2000 years.

No; you did NOT!!!

"The Catholic Bible is the same today as it was two thousand years ago. "

5,570 posted on 01/09/2015 4:32:57 AM PST by Elsie ( Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794