It seems to me you could write this to yourself.
Nice copout, you were teasing me? How sick, what a lame excuse to make me into an ex-con.
I would make a joke here, but I think you would misunderstand that as well. You were boasting, in my view, of being at Altamont, doing a favor for Mick Jagger, being in the movie, speaking up for Sonny Barger, and defending his violent gang. It was natural that I might consider you were claiming to be one of the security force. Now, what you don't apparently know, and I use apparently since you have not clarified the relationship you boasted of (that is for you to do if you don't want others to misinterpret your boasting), is that not only was Sonny Barger sent to prison in the 80s but he also spent much of the 1970s behind bars. When Sonny went to Folsom State Prison, he had lots of his gang visit him.Teasing a gang member about Sonny's new residence was a trigger for assault and/or homocide. It was their way. That is why I wrote I should not have teased you. It is along the lines of the cartoons and perverse jokes about Mohammed, why rile up demons on purpose ? It is foolish to tease one of Sonny's gang about his going to prison so often. It happened to many, but I would not go so far to say it could happen to anyone, at least not for those crimes.
Not good enough. [You are referring to the Hell's Angels right? Scared to say it are you?]
I find the name demonic; apparently you are comfortable with it. I know we differ.
LOL oh yeah they may come after you now! Geeze...
One would have to make the mistake of being provocative in person, so to speak, not something I recommend.
Oh gosh, what a sentence! You are nervous huh?
No, unfortunately I'm using a smart phone and it is inconvenient and tends toward grammatical and spelling errors I prefer to avoid. Being surrounded by Moslems makes me nervous. Their gangs tend to also be violent, albeit for different reasons.
I see you are redeeming yourself a bit by saying that they (that "particular" club was [read "were" for grammar's sake]) in the past violent and vicious.
I was discussing Altamont, so my comments applied to that generation, which has aged quite a bit. It's difficult to be quite as violent when one is old and in the way, so to speak.
Very good, maybe you know they bought hundreds of bicycles (and other toys) for poor kids last month.
An organization can be a violent criminal enterprise and still do acts of charity for their community.
I would make a joke here, but I think you would misunderstand that as well. You were boasting, in my view, of being at Altamont, doing a favor for Mick Jagger, being in the movie, speaking up for Sonny Barger, and defending his violent gang.Do you ever get anything right?
Just posting facts, which you would rather exchange for the media reports and things you make up.
I'll get back to you in a while, I can't be bothered with your tripe at this time.
None of what you just posted is true.