To: CynicalBear
again weak
“brought forth her firstborn son”
“her firstborn son” is a title conveying inheritance and does not indicate there was a “second born son”.
whew
386 posted on
12/15/2014 7:54:21 AM PST by
LurkingSince'98
(Ad Majoram Dei Gloriam = FOR THE GREATER GLORY OF GOD)
To: LurkingSince'98
again weak brought forth her firstborn son her firstborn son is a title conveying inheritance and does not indicate there was a second born son. if you check out the greek words used for son in this passage and then for son in John 3:16 you will see the difference.
don't have time to post it right now, but will later.
To: LurkingSince'98
her firstborn son is a title conveying inheritance and does not indicate there was a second born son. whew
Whew indeed!
Matthew 1:25
But he did not consummate their marriage until she gave birth to a son.
This 'indicates' that they DID get it on AFTER the FIRST BORN SON appeared.
Whew!
492 posted on
12/15/2014 11:57:12 AM PST by
Elsie
( Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson