Oh really? So you would say that a vow isn't binding?
>> Matthew 25 says nothing about bridesmaids of the same kind used in Christian weddings.<<
Semantics will get you no where.
>>Although ring exchanges are allowed in Judaism now, the only ring required is the bride’s. Notice, as I said before, weddings rings EXCHANGED.<<
I wear no ring.
>>Christians don’t follow the Talmud.<<
I didn't say they did or should. I simply showed that those things you claimed were purely pagan have a base in scripture. Deny all you want but it simply makes you look petty.
“Oh really? So you would say that a vow isn’t binding?”
Why would anyone say that a vow isn’t binding because a wedding contract is not a wedding vow? There’s no connection between those two ideas.
“Semantics will get you no where.”
It isn’t semantics.
“I wear no ring.”
Now. We’ve been over this before. Remember?
“I didn’t say they did or should. I simply showed that those things you claimed were purely pagan have a base in scripture.”
And you were wrong. The Talmud is not scripture.
“Deny all you want but it simply makes you look petty.”
I was right. That isn’t petty no matter how you try to portray that way.