Replies

“It is trickery to try to get a poster to click on a video link with no indication of what the content is.”

No. You either click on it or not. There was no trickery. Here’s a link. Click on it or don’t. It’s your choice. There’s no trickery involved:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q251EywW__M

“Claiming a question can be “untrue” when it is just asking is absurd.”

No, you showed that your question was untrue by saying later that you wanted NOT AN ACTUAL ANSWER TO YOUR QUESTION but something else. 1) You said you employed “trickery” and even much later apologized for doing it so that is beyond dispute. 2) You asked , “Without backup for your claims, you post a south park video??” That is the exact quote from you. If I simply responded to the “south park” reference, the appropriate response would have been “No” since it was not a South Park video. But you didn’t ask what the video was. You asked if it was a South Park video and you only asked that in relation to “Without backup for your claims…” which clearly made it look like you have viewed the video.

Remember, you said you employed “trickery”. There is no escaping your own words. You are trapped by them.

“I admitted I tricked you into doing what you should have done in the beginning, say what the video was about.”

So, in other words, rather than being an adult about the approach it is better to use trickery? Isn’t that what this means, “I admitted I tricked you into doing what you should have done in the beginning, say what the video was about.”

And, by the way, did I ever tell you what the video exactly was? No. So as a trick to find out what the video was it failed. Yet you have repeatedly said “I admitted I tricked you” so I have every reason to think the “trickery” was about something else.

“You tried to trick me, so I tricked you back.”

No. This is the second or third time you have made this false claim. I NEVER EVEN ONCE ATTEMPTED TO TRICK YOU. Is that clear enough for you? Do the caps help you see it? You write “I admitted I tricked you” but don’t you dare say that I tried to trick you because that is COMPLETELY FALSE.

I can’t stop you from making a completely false claim over and over again, but for you to actually use it as some excuse for what you have already admitted to (“I admitted I tricked you”) is ridiculous.

“As you can see in the last post to which I replied, God does not condemn me. Why do you?”

Condemning you? I post your own words to you. If you feel that’s condemning to you, then what does that say about those words and the actions that precipitated them?

“Doesn’t matter to me except for the comfort of your soul.”

Don’t worry, my soul is more than comforted by Christ and the Holy Spirit. But you keep digging your hole deeper and still come up with bizarre things such as “God does not condemn me. Why do you?”

“You know, admitting what a person does so they don’t have to carry it around.”

Yet you keep getting right back in that hole and digging and digging it deeper. How is any of that helping you when you make what sure sound like half-excusatory statements. Own it or disown it, but just do something correctly and all the way.

2 Timothy 1:7; 1 Corinthians 16:13;