There is a difference between questions asked because someone seeks an answer and someone who seeks an argument. There are honest questions, and there are dishonest questions.
There are honest misunderstandings and intentional twisting of Scriptures to fit someone’s preferences.
There are those who desire to pluck partial sentences from Scripture, as opposed to looking at the entirety of what the Scriptures say on a topic, and from the perversion base their entire theology and self-righteous insistence on the perversion as being “truth.”
You seek the perversion and tp argue, and therefore I have no time for dishonest questions or intentional perversions where I would otherwise take all day to answer honest questions and genuine misunderstandings. I have no patience for dishonesty.
I know your only design to create arguments, and knew exactly where you were coning from after your second or third post. You are a dishonest questioner and willfully perverted in your insistence in perverting the intent of the Scriptures.
Therefore, engaging in any topic of Scripture with you is like casting pearls before swine.
Period.
Amen!
Catholicism is very through in their indoctrination, the penalties for not accepting all their doctrine are quite severe.
“There is a difference between questions asked because someone seeks an answer and someone who seeks an argument.”
I’m not the one in this thread you should be telling this to.
“There are honest questions, and there are dishonest questions.”
The latter kind come from Protestants.
“There are honest misunderstandings and intentional twisting of Scriptures to fit someone’s preferences.”
The latter is what Protestants do.
“There are those who desire to pluck partial sentences from Scripture, as opposed to looking at the entirety of what the Scriptures say on a topic, and from the perversion base their entire theology and self-righteous insistence on the perversion as being “truth.””
Protestants do that all the time.
“You seek the perversion and tp argue,”
What you’re doing now is officially called “mind reading” here at FR religion forum and is prohibited.
“and therefore I have no time for dishonest questions or intentional perversions”
What you’re doing now is officially called “mind reading” here at FR religion forum and is prohibited.
where I would otherwise take all day to answer honest questions and genuine misunderstandings. I have no patience for dishonesty.
“I know your only design to create arguments,”
What you’re doing now is officially called “mind reading” here at FR religion forum and is prohibited.
“and knew exactly where you were coning from after your second or third post.”
What you’re doing now is officially called “mind reading” here at FR religion forum and is prohibited.
“You are a dishonest questioner and willfully perverted in your insistence in perverting the intent of the Scriptures.”
What you’re doing now is officially called “mind reading” here at FR religion forum and is prohibited.
“Therefore, engaging in any topic of Scripture with you is like casting pearls before swine.”
You have said that now twice. Why do you keep doing that “casting pearls before swine” then?
“Period.”
Sure.
Discuss the issues all you like, but do not make it personal.