Replies

“So, you concede I have posted NO anti Catholic posts?”

Not at all. I think your posts speak for themselves.

“If I did, I’m sure you would have found them and rubbed my nose in them.”

No, I just post your own words. There’s no need to rub your nose in what you write.

“Follow along.”

You’re not the one to lead anything. Remember, “you fell for my wording”? Remember, “...I tricked you.” So, no, there won’t be any following when you’re “leading”.

“The point was that you DID NOT give any indication what the youtube link was about.”

I didn’t have to.

“Trying to trick me into watching your boy Tom Hanks doing what ever he was doing.”

No trick. There was a video. I posted a link. There was no trick. According to your logic, unless someone describes the exact content of what lies at the end of link, that person is trying to trick you. That’s sounds crazy.

“He’s such a homosexualist I don’t watch anything of his.”

It doesn’t matter if you do. Doesn’t matter if you don’t. You keep making ridiculous excuses.

“So I tricked you back.”

No, you simply said something that was untrue. There was no “tricked you back” because there was no trick on my part in the first place. Again, you keep inventing ridiculous excuses.

“Like I said previously, I’m sorry I tricked you. I had no idea you would take it so hard.”

Like I said previously, calling it a trick doesn’t excuse posting something that is clearly false. I had every idea that you would take this hard.

“Thanks for vindicating me by not being able to come up with any posts where I was anti Catholic.”

Again, your posts - with their false statements and “trickery” - speak for themselves.

“LOL except of course all of my posts! Oh my...”

You said it. You already said you posted something that wasn’t true and you said you resorted to “trickery” so you might as well say this too.

“You were trying to help me by doing that? Well Thank You!”

I’m more than happy to watch you dig your hole deeper.