Baloney. Mental semantic gymnastics serving no purpost. Facts is facts.
I asked a simple question, explained quite clearly in more that one post to you.
In the same way, your question, “Without backup for your claims, you post a south park video??” means you are saying that the video was a South Park video. It’s just that simple.
Double baloney. No it doesn't.
It means you have no backup for your claims.
You claimed it was one thing when it was another.
No I didn't, I asked you a question. From watching your posts it seemed you would post a South Park video. Just a guess.
Then my eyes glazed over as you continued with the convoluted sematic gymnastics which you already posted. I would have added as nausem if I knew how to spell it.
And then a block of text, sorry I can't read stuff like that, it's too difficult when someone doesn't use proper HTML
I remain vindicated.
“Baloney. Mental semantic gymnastics serving no purpost.”
This shows who’s doing the mental gymnastics:
1) “Without backup for your claims, you post a south park video??”
2) “No, of course I didn’t” [say it was a South Park video]
3) “You will see you fell for my wording so I could find out what the video was about.”
“Facts is facts.”
Boy, are they ever. See above.
“I asked a simple question, explained quite clearly in more that one post to you.”
Simple? You did this: “You will see you fell for my wording so I could find out what the video was about.” That’s not simple. There’s a word for it, but it isn’t “simple”.
“Double baloney. No it doesn’t.”
Add some cheese and you might have a sandwich. What you won’t have is an explanation that works.
“It means you have no backup for your claims.”
What you posted - “you fell for my wording” - says it all.
“No I didn’t, I asked you a question. From watching your posts it seemed you would post a South Park video. Just a guess.”
“you fell for my wording” shows it wasn’t just a question or a guess.
“Then my eyes glazed over as you continued with the convoluted sematic gymnastics which you already posted.”
Nothing I said shows as much “convoluted sematic [sic] gymnastics” as “you fell for my wording”.
“I would have added as nausem if I knew how to spell it.”
Suddenly your “you fell for my wording” mojo has failed?
“And then a block of text, sorry I can’t read stuff like that, it’s too difficult when someone doesn’t use proper HTML”
It’s called a “long paragraph”. Perhaps you’ll run across one if you read a book sometime.
“I remain vindicated.”
You can’t remain what you weren’t.
You can keep digging the hole deeper. I don’t mind watching you do it. I’m patient. You’re doing all the self-defeating work here. All I have to do is post what you post.